thehabhater
Some call me Tim
I will save you time. Not winning a playoff series since 2004 is far more important to address.
I will save you time. Not winning a playoff series since 2004 is far more important to address.
I believe that can be addressed by being a good hockey team, which as zeke has showed, they are.I will save you time. Not winning a playoff series since 2004 is far more important to address.
Looking solely at last year for this year, x-factor for me is McCabe vs Muzzin.. If he can be as good as Jake was then there's a good chance this is a better roster overall. Up front you've basically got Jarn replacing Mikheyev and ROR replacing Kampf in the top 9. Acciari for Engvall is largely a wash. 4th line doesn't mean so much and even if they may have slightly gotten worse(?) due to Lafferty and ZAR being fairly useless, if I recall they were unplayable last playoffs anyway. D could be a wash if McCabe = Muzzin and goaltending should theoretically be better but there's too much variance to know for sure in a 7 game series.re-jigged the lines based on evolving-wild's line tool. I think these have been the lines, with our likely lines this year:
View attachment 15592
he still isn't going to bring the impact of a Meier.
You can shut down all you want, but if you end up losing 1-0, yip dee doo.Disagree. If McCabe is as good as he has looked recently and continues to make up one of the leagues top shutdown pairs, at $2m for 3 playoff runs, that value far exceeds anything Meier would have brought to the table.
Well, I guess that clinches it. He's bad.Yeah, it takes a special player to match the impact of 6 points in 13 games since the trade.
Might be a bit rash to write him off like that. You don't just score 35+ because you're on a bad team.The hype on Meier did surprise me. Putting up good not great points on awful teams shouldnt get that kind of praise.