BTW, what PK did last night, Claude Giroux does every few games but you never hear a peep about it on TSN, Sportnet, etc. Just saying.
For all of you complaining about the refs for that game, what's your main complain?
While I didn't like the misconduct on Subban, I understand why the call was made based on what the ref saw. I'm pretty sure he was none too happy to see Stone come back so quickly as well.
The penalty on Eller was justified.
The penalty on DLR is the only one I have an issue with.
The Sens got away with a lot of stuff but we got away with a few as well, including a blatant high stick by Subban.
For all of you complaining about the refs for that game, what's your main complain?
While I didn't like the misconduct on Subban, I understand why the call was made based on what the ref saw. I'm pretty sure he was none too happy to see Stone come back so quickly as well.
The penalty on Eller was justified.
The penalty on DLR is the only one I have an issue with.
The Sens got away with a lot of stuff but we got away with a few as well, including a blatant high stick by Subban.
http://www.tsn.ca/talent/senators-suggest-subban-targeted-stone-all-night-1.258265
So desperate. I guess they feel they need a suspension on PK to win the series?
Oh no, best player being targeted in the playoffs. What's the world coming to?
Cameron was strategically trying to make it an "Us vs the World" environment for his team. Everyone's out to get us etc...
no consistency at all.
When my friends who hate the Habs (Leafs fans) comment on the bad officiating, I know it was really bad. Sens play clutch and grab, interference hockey
As I posted in another thread, blame the lack of flexibility in the rule not the refs who were merely the messengers and enforced it correctly.
http://www.tsn.ca/talent/senators-suggest-subban-targeted-stone-all-night-1.258265
So desperate. I guess they feel they need a suspension on PK to win the series?
Oh no, best player being targeted in the playoffs. What's the world coming to?
As I posted in another thread, blame the lack of flexibility in the rule not the refs who were merely the messengers and enforced it correctly.
I don't know how seriously anyone should take Dave Cameron at this point. One of his friends died of cancer this week thus he was bound to get irrational in front of the microphone.
As far as the slash itself goes, it should have been a penalty and I don't think Stone was faking all of his pain when he was hit in an unprotected area of his arm. Just because it wasn't broken, didn't mean he wasn't hurt. But Subban is likely off the hook for a suspension for having already been ejected from game 1.
Shaun Starr
@PxPOttawa I actually broke the news that Tiger Woods went into the Sens dressing room and fixed Stone's hand.
Starting Game 2 is way too early for it to happen, but it would not surprise me to see Craig Anderson between the pipes at some point. If you're suggesting the media playing mind games, sure, anything goes.
What frustrated me with the refs last night was how it seemed so one-sided. And there was some very, very egregious penalties that should have been called much earlier on.
Subban's penalty should have been a two and that's all. The amount of times you see players gets slashed and go down, now is when you make it a 5 min penalty because Floppy The Seal falls to the ice like his hand was sliced? I know the NHL rulebook says that by the letter of the law, it's a 5+game, but the NHL rulebook also states that a hook is a penalty. Don't know about you, but the refs chose not to call any of the hooks last night. NHL rulebook states that interference is a penalty. Didn't call any of interference last night on either side. The refs were always picking & choosing what do and don't call.