• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

The New Division

Based on what? Stop pulling this BS out of your ass. Young players often improve, the oldest person on that list is Franson at 26 and they have not even hit their prime years yet.

based on educated guesses

and wasnt it this board that went to great lengths to show that prime years are earlier than people think

especially with elite players like kessel
 
I'm really not following your argument here. Why does Kessel need to improve? He's already a PPG guy. We have a good team now and it's one of the youngest rosters in the league. So why are we 26th?

you really arnt

because i do not think you are 26th

i would have no clue how to rank these...but I admire the courage it takes to look 3 years out and make a prediction
im just looking at the criteria and trying to figure out what they are looking at

Kessel doesnt need to improve. He is already elite. I expect him to put up the same kind of season this year as in 3 years.
Elite top 5 winger type of season.


for the record i have no clue how they see the habs as 5th either
my guess is they overate price, subban and the prospects...and ignore the impact of having no markov (or even older markov)
 
explain how it's horrible 3 years from now because you think it's horrible now.

did i say it was horrible three years from now?

if i did...i didnt mean that...i mean it is horrible now

again...how would you recommend we look at the cap 3 years from now?

im guessing you have nothing but i am open to suggestions
 
For HL...if you are an insider you might wanna check this out

Corey Pronman ‏@coreypronman
Also for ESPN Insiders: I evaluated each NHL team's U23 core
 
I'm not an insider. I can only assume we're bottom 10 though. Like every prospect ranking/future watch I can remember for pretty much forever.
 
C Kadri 22 - yes
W Kessel 25 - no
W VanRiemsdyk 24 - no

D Gardiner 23 - yes
D Rielly 19 - is a prospect
D Franson 26 - no

G Reimer 25 - no
G Bernier 25 - perhaps

so in your opinion, JVR has peaked at age 23, in his first year of getting top-6 minutes.

Franson peaked at age 25, without even getting a full top-4 chance yet.

Reimer and Bernier have peaked at age 24, despite neither even getting a full season starting opportunity yet.

that makes sense.
 
that isnt what they said

"2016-17 outlook"

So in three years we'll be the fourth worst team despite having excellent scoring, fairly decent defence and above average goaltending and management. Why does it feel like Pierre LeBrun helped with this so he could shit on the Leafs anonymously?
 
did i say it was horrible three years from now?

if i did...i didnt mean that...i mean it is horrible now

but the ranking is based on the next 3 years.

again...how would you recommend we look at the cap 3 years from now?

im guessing you have nothing but i am open to suggestions

you're guessing I have nothing? how about looking at the Leafs current contracts in 3 years, then consider the cap is going up, then make your decision?

seems pretty obvious.
 
but the ranking is based on the next 3 years.



you're guessing I have nothing? how about looking at the Leafs current contracts in 3 years, then consider the cap is going up, then make your decision?

seems pretty obvious.

it is relative

cap is going up for all teams
 
so in your opinion, JVR has peaked at age 23, in his first year of getting top-6 minutes.

Franson peaked at age 25, without even getting a full top-4 chance yet.

Reimer and Bernier have peaked at age 24, despite neither even getting a full season starting opportunity yet.

that makes sense.

umm yes
 
I was wrong... it's THIS thread that delivers.

I knew people would go apeshit over that ridiculous chart.

Heh.
 
Oh and if Karlsson ever dreamed of being better than Subban he should wake up and apologize.
 
Back
Top