• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: American Politics

Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Dude, just lay off it.

The party knows he sucks. The electorate knows he sucks. We all know he sucks. He's a nice enough guy, but he shouldn't be leader. You're preaching to the converted here.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

jackie+chan+meme+500x280.jpg
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
No, it's not even remotely comparable to being the same situation. You're comparing a situation where two parties have equivalent access to information to a situation where one party has confidential access to data and the other doesn't.

It's imbalanced to start with.
Click to expand...

So you mean kind of like how you argue about law and the legal system when you do not work in field and know how it works but act like you do anyway?
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

TheCountofMonteCristo said:
So you mean kind of like how you argue about law and the legal system when you do not work in field and know how it works but act like you do anyway?
Click to expand...

I don't do that, so no.

Having a philosophical discussion about the meanings and interpretations of laws, or what constitutes a just law differs from an actual practical application of existing statutes.

Try again.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Coming from the most radical left wing poster on the forum I'll take that as a compliment. Why don't you pretend to be indignant about unions some more?

No one's falling for your attempts at looking impartial or centrist.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

And honestly, you're exactly like kb, only the extremist left version.

I publicly repudiate Hudak for literally two years on here and you somehow convince yourself I'm defending him. Total clown shoes behaviour on your part.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
Coming from the most radical left wing poster on the forum I'll take that as a compliment. Why don't you pretend to be indignant about unions some more?

No one's falling for your attempts at looking impartial or centrist.
Click to expand...
You mean nobody that matters to me.

JaysCyYoung said:
And honestly, you're exactly like kb, only the extremist left version.

I publicly repudiate Hudak for literally two years on here and you somehow convince yourself I'm defending him. Total clown shoes behaviour on your part.
Click to expand...

AH! Finally, we meet a member of the 20%!
And just for clarity, your original "2 years" claim was more than just you. Nice try, again.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
I don't do that, so no.

Having a philosophical discussion about the meanings and interpretations of laws, or what constitutes a just law differs from an actual practical application of existing statutes.

Try again.
Click to expand...

you do that but will never admit so there is no point in going on
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

No, I don't.

You are clearly conflating philosophical interpretations of something with a practical interpretation of it. That would be erroneous.

(i.e. confusing someone saying what they believe a law should be versus what it actually is)

And I'm not talking to you anyways. Stop interjecting with frivolous commentary with me in every other thread.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

And by many, many in the party, including the current insubordination that is ongoing. Why are you disputing this?
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
No, I don't.

You are clearly conflating philosophical interpretations of something with a practical interpretation of it. That would be erroneous.

(i.e. confusing someone saying what they believe a law should be versus what it actually is)

And I'm not talking to you anyways. Stop interjecting with frivolous commentary with me in every other thread.
Click to expand...

Never stopped you from adding in crap about me when you weren't involved so bite me. I will respond to anything I want whenever I want and I guarantee I will not stop posting because you tell me not to, in fact I am more likely to do the opposite.

Not sure why you think you can tell people when they can post, what they can post, about whom they can post etc.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

Go die in a fire.

I can't ignore you for some asinine reason (maybe I should lobby Habsy to pull another kb situation here), so I have to put up with it otherwise.

Telling you to butt out of things that don't concern you is the only option I have.
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

JaysCyYoung said:
And by many, many in the party, including the current insubordination that is ongoing. Why are you disputing this?
Click to expand...

YOU say the dissent has been going on for "two years."
The facts say that he had almost 80% of your party's support in February of 2012.
YOU are FULL OF SHIT on this one. Why are you disputing this?
 
Re: OT: Canadian Politics

I already explained why the leadership vote FROM 19 MONTHS AGO turned out the way it did. Kindly reference post #8484.

Do you understand now? You do understand what politicking is, right?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top