yes, but he is 37 and we should try to have a better team.
by signing Marchand, who is 6 months older than Pacioretty, to a big money deal.
are you actually suggesting Patches > Marchy? or even = ?
I read it and have no idea what argument you are making. other than the question I asked. which is why I asked it.read the conversation.
what were we wrong about?you guys still can't admit how wrong you were.
pretty adorbs.
disagreePatches was good in the regular season,
agreeand very good in the playoffs.
okayfor peanuts.
I mean he had what, like three separate injury stints this year? which is what most of us forecast, and turned out to be accurate. he's not reliable as a full-time guy for the season and playoffs.You guys were wrong about how good he was, and now continue to say he could only be a 12/13th forward because he is old. While eagerly lining up to pay actual real money for real term for even older players
show the actual GF/GA instead of just rate stats...I know it's hard to accept that he matched up quite well with the older marchand when we played them these playoffs. And of course, their price points won't be remotely similar this offseason.