HeyKurtz
Well-known member
I disagree to some extent. Dundon is all about maximizing performance for each dollar he spends. If he thinks the total number of dollars he's spending will deliver better performance (i.e., paying KK roughly $1 million to go away and spending the other roughly $4 million he would have had to pay him to pay someone else), he will do so.And I agree with Jerry that Dundon paying somebody not to work seems counter to his general thing.