This will be interesting to see how it unfoldsI think we are overall underrated. We'll miss Marner, sure, but not as much as most think.
Also, we can have our best playoff run without him without a doubt.
This will be interesting to see how it unfoldsI think we are overall underrated. We'll miss Marner, sure, but not as much as most think.
Also, we can have our best playoff run without him without a doubt.
All we need is to actually get support scoring and we'll do better than with Marner.This will be interesting to see how it unfolds
not so sure about thatAll we need is to actually get support scoring and we'll do better than with Marner.
You've spent the last few years saying that they'd be better without Marner. Why the change of heart?not so sure about that
That's the #1 issue by far. I know everyone says core 4, but they lead in scoring every yearnot so sure about that
The Laughton trade was so horrendous. We badly needed those assets and trade prices were low this summer in compared to trade deadline.They have an opportunity to be a better team without Marner, but this was the worst offseason to lose him for nothing because there were no good free agents.
And Tre totally fucked up trading two firsts and 2 of our top 3 prospects for a 4C and 5D, leaving us with no assets to acquire top of the lineup players to replace Marner.
They'll feel his loss. Hes amazing, and its looks like they will enter the season short handed ($9 mill in cap space) with no trade assets.
Leafs previous regime waited too long deciding his futureYou've spent the last few years saying that they'd be better without Marner. Why the change of heart?
c'mon, we all know that the same former Leaf is always far, far superior to what he was as a LeafOh he's a top end player now
Don't be coy.Oh he's a top end player now
Geeman has been posting for years about how Marner sucks and is not a top player you can win with. Pretty sure that was what the post was directed towardsDon't be coy.
In what bizzaro world is a 100-point player not a top end player, however bad he might be in the playoffs ?
Geeman is right. Playoff Marner does suck. But that doesn't mean you can replace him with nobody.Geeman has been posting for years about how Marner sucks and is not a top player you can win with. Pretty sure that was what the post was directed towards
It’s the same schtick troll hab fan usually abides to here. It’s in the manual.Geeman has been posting for years about how Marner sucks and is not a top player you can win with. Pretty sure that was what the post was directed towards
Don't be coy.
In what bizzaro world is a 100-point player not a top end player, however bad he might be in the playoffs ?