LeafOfFaith
Well-known member
I don't understand the desire to let him just walk away from statements he has made several times in different ways. It's not just one tweet. These are his beliefs. But when he got deeper into his campaign, he had to back off so as to not alienate too many. So why don't you ask AI about some of the different instances:We can go through some of these issues one by one if you really want to - I'd prefer not to spend the time, unless you'e open-minded enough to discuss them rationally, and consider changing your opinion.
But let's talk about one issue here - defunding the police. As you know, many folks got upset at police tactics after what happened to George Floyd. Some discourse got heated, as information came out about how many white supremacists and racist scumbags work in law enforcement. People also noted that many police departments, even in small towns, were wearing military-grade tactical gear with high-powered weapons and looked like they were cosplaying Call of Duty, rather than keeping the peace. Some people suggested their budgets might be too big - do they really need all of this firepower and armor?
Now let's (hopefully) quickly agree that working in law enforcement is a dangerous and extremely stressful job. Police officers need to be protected from violent criminals. I'm sure there are some morons out there who literally want to defund all police, but most rational people were talking about reviewing their training, and their budgets, and there's nothing wrong with doing that. Every department everywhere should do that periodically, yes?
Now for Mamdani specifically, in 2020 he posted on social media: "We don't need an investigation to know that the NYPD is racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety. What we need is to #DefundTheNYPD" and "There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt... Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence".
Now, we're all aware that if you post a 130-character sentence on Twitter, that sums up your entire worldview on any given topic and you can never ever be allowed to expand your point or better explain your opinion in more detail, ever since "nuance" was brutally murdered several years ago. Nor is anyone allowed to apologize for saying something dumb, or change their views, so tweets from 5 years ago must count as the word of God. But - as our wonderful AI overlords can summarize:
I pulled and verified public posts, event coverage, and news reporting. Below is a compiled, sourced list of the distinct public instances (tweets, posts, and public statements / events) where Zohran Mamdani explicitly supported “defund the police” (or used very similar language such as “defund the NYPD,” “dismantle it,” etc.). I list the date (or month/year when no exact day was in the source), the platform or outlet, the exact / proximate quote reported, and a source link.
- June 2020 — Twitter / X — Called the NYPD “racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety” and used the #DefundTheNYPD phrasing in a tweet. X (formerly Twitter)
- Late 2020 (December 2020 reported) — Twitter / X — Viral post including: “There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt. Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence.” (reported and quoted by multiple outlets). X (formerly Twitter)+1
- November 2020 (tweet reported by outlets) — Twitter / X — Linked LGBTQ+ liberation to police abolition in a tweet (reported as saying variants such as “queer liberation means defund the police”). Fox News
- June 12, 2021 — Public rally (organizer / speaker) — QNS / local coverage — Organized and spoke at a rally described as calling for the “defunding of the NYPD” (the article quotes Mamdani framing the demand as divestment from the NYPD and investment in communities). QNS
- Multiple social-media posts and Instagram content (mid-2020) — Instagram / Twitter posts reported in press — Posts stating variations like “Defund the NYPD. House the poor.” and calling for cutting the NYPD budget (e.g., proposals like cutting $1B/year) — reported by local press and aggregators.
So why do I have to ignore these things, but take his later backtracks during an election campaign as his "real" views on the matter? It's ridiculous. As they say, if someone tells you who they are, you should listen to them.