I mean, I like Guy Carbonneau, I respect Guy Carbonneau. He was a very good player for a very long time. Is he a HOFer? Ok, sure, we can make room for good overall hockey players and leaders. The guys who did it in the faceoff circle, and the corners, and the locker room, and were deservedly recognized for they defensive prowess while still contributing on the offensive side of the ice (well, in Carbonneau's case at least until his last 6 seasons).
My question here is 'what exactly are these super secretive group of 18 using as criteria to come up with their inductees'? Guy Carbonneau is in, and we will hear all of the accolades about his defensive game and him captaining the Habs for years and how he did all of the little things right and how he won 3 Cups. And all of that will be 100% true. Great, fine, ok. So....what did Guy Carbonneau do BETTER than Rod Brind'Amour over the course of his career?
I think the only answer here really is 'he was captain of the Habs and won 2 Cups there' and he won 3 Cups. That makes him possibly more popular or well known than Rod Brind'Amour, but it doesn't mean he did anything better than Brind'Amour.
Again, this isn't about Carbonneau not being worthy, I just would like an explanation from someone who actually does this voting as to how it is that Guy Carbonneau is a HOFer and Rod Brind'Amour is not. You can't point to a single stat that explains it. They both were defensive rocks. Both dominating in the faceoffs circle and locker room. They both won Cups (Guy had 2 more, some of that could be attributed to being in the right place at the right time though).
That is all this is about for me Habsy. I'm not going to ever say that Guy Carbonneau is not HOF worthy. He was one of if not the best Defensive forwards of his generation. Great, now one of you 18 voting members hiding in the shadows, explain why Rod Brind'Amour isn't also going in if Guy Carbonneau is.