I know . . . but it’s still weird.there are worst ways to make $$ than pontificate on watching your fave sport
I know . . . but it’s still weird.there are worst ways to make $$ than pontificate on watching your fave sport
And just as I start reading up on Kyle Dubas, well well well, what do you know? He got in scouting for the Sault Ste. Marie Greyhounds because he had ties to the organization.Strange that I write (and you bolden) scouts, then proceed to list a name of people... let me check... in management. A list of people who have never been either amateur or professional scouts at a single point in their careers. Oh, sorry, Dubas scouted a little in his early 20s, but that's really what got him into the door to be in the NHL.
Some of you have a real hard time understanding English tonight, boy.
People who get in the door to be scouts almost never get in through their competences. They get in because they're mostly former players who have a former coach or teammate in a team's management and try to climb the ranks. Or, in the case of Tom Fitzgerald, retire from being a player get right into a prime management position for an NHL team.
Exactly. Stop believing that rich people get rich because they're smart. They get rich usually by already being rich and for their willingness to act completely unethical and ruthless while stomping on whoever is in their path. The world is lousy with smart poor people. Trump is a fucking moron and he got to be President.That's a nice fantasy world you live in.
In the real world, though? Scouts have always, always, always (Boisvert included, who got his scouting job because Mathias Brunet's old gym teacher was the GM of a team in the Q and got him an interview) been hired because of people they know. Especially in hockey circles.
Marinaro is patheticOne of the very rare things I like about Boisvert on Marinaro's show: It exposes just how fucking dreadful Marinaro is as an interviewer.
Regardless of what you think of Boisvert, he's no dummy. Sal believes for some odd reason that he lives in his parents' basement, which I still find odd considering Boisvert is releasing a movie he wrote, produced & directed, but whatever. Boisvert's got a wealth of knowledge and he knows his shit.
The fact that Marinaro can't keep a conversation going with him because he just doesn't like what Boisvert has to say is incredible. The amount of awkward pauses and silence is just dreadful to listen to.
Boisvert has hit on some calls and missed on others just like anyone else. E.G. He thought Conner Geekie was one of the best, if not the best in 2022.
As far as this year goes, I'm still very high on Berkly Catton. And no, he's not related to me, lol. I'm even more high on him now that we know he's been playing with a nagging hip issue all year. I can't even begin to imagine how many points he would've scored if healthy. Here is a great overall assessment of this, IMO, future NHL star.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xuGJvFZ4GI
you must have missed the memo on X and Social Media, you can win a Cup with 18 5'9 players as long as they are skilled,,,He’d fit in great on a big, heavy team like VGK. Not so much on ours, which is already small up front. It’s not a good fit here, or rather, there will be better fits available for us when we draft.
Not when you have many on your top 9you must have missed the memo on X and Social Media, you can win a Cup with 18 5'9 players as long as they are skilled,,,
Tampa did just fine without huge forwards. Don't get me wrong, I totally understand the benefits of having big players. But you don't bite off your nose to spite your face and go size over elite skill. Haven't we learned our lesson from picking guys like Kotkaniemi, Mcarron, Poehling, Chouinard, Jason Ward etc?you must have missed the memo on X and Social Media, you can win a Cup with 18 5'9 players as long as they are skilled,,,
I don't think we're that small in our core players going forward, and we have a huge need for skilled players. And Catton isn't that small at 5'11, but he's a bit of a tooth pick right now at 170lbs, he'll probably mature out in the Kadri body mold. I'd take the bigger similarly skilled player, but I'd take the much more skilled player over a bigger alternative.He’d fit in great on a big, heavy team like VGK. Not so much on ours, which is already small up front. It’s not a good fit here, or rather, there will be better fits available for us when we draft.
Bill Gates was born into wealth. His father was a partner in a law firm and his mother was on the board of directors for a bank. My dad was in sales and my mom was an RN who got married in 1961 and didn't buy their first house until 1974. The only reason we were even a 2 car family was because my dad's sales gig included a company car. So no, not a family like mine at all.Bezos didn't have $$ as a child. Gates came from a family like yours. Andrew Carnegie and Cornelius Vanderbilt came from nothing as did Walt Disney
Strawman argument. No one is advocating picking bigger, unskilled players instead of Catton. Lindstrom, Eiserman and Iginla are bigger than Catton, but are highly skilled. Talented bigger trumps talented smaller player unless we’re talking about Connor Bedrard type, but we’re not re: Catton.Tampa did just fine without huge forwards. Don't get me wrong, I totally understand the benefits of having big players. But you don't bite off your nose to spite your face and go size over elite skill. Haven't we learned our lesson from picking guys like Kotkaniemi, Mcarron, Poehling, Chouinard, Jason Ward etc?
See my post directly above.Get high end skill, enough with the size hur hur dur
I heard on one of the podcasts that the Habs are something like the 6th biggest team in the league. Is that real?I don't think we're that small in our core players going forward, and we have a huge need for skilled players. And Catton isn't that small at 5'11, but he's a bit of a tooth pick right now at 170lbs, he'll probably mature out in the Kadri body mold. I'd take the bigger similarly skilled player, but I'd take the much more skilled player over a bigger alternative.
Well, with LIndstrom we have a bigger issue now (no pun intended). And that is the fact he only played 32 games this year. There is no way we take a chance on him especially with our injury history. Besides that though, I personally don't see translatable "skill" with him. And I watched him this year. And especially in the playoffs. He played mean and tough when he wanted vs smaller players. But became very shy anytime Fabrizi was near him. I like this kid. I just don't see the upside you and others do. And a bad back enough to miss most of the season seals the deal. I do like Eiserman though, I just feel Catton is a far more well rounded player and clearly higher skilled overall. If he didn't have all the personal issues, I also like Connelly. Very, very skilled. 6'1", super fast skater and eilte hands, vision, playmaking and hockey IQ.Except no one is advocating picking bigger, unskilled players here. Lindstrom, Eiserman and Iginla are bigger than Catton, but are highly skilled.