Only path to another top 10 is next years first top 3 protected plus Pegs pick in a packagePeg's pick, Gally and 3 Vancouver condos might get you future considerations.
Only path to another top 10 is next years first top 3 protected plus Pegs pick in a packagePeg's pick, Gally and 3 Vancouver condos might get you future considerations.
Creative but I have a hard time seeing a team taking that gambleOnly path to another top 10 is next years first top 3 protected plus Pegs pick in a package
But I can see one of 2 scenariosCreative but I have a hard time seeing a team taking that gamble
Mostly an issue on D though. We definitely have to unload a few of them.I think the binding issue will be the 23 man roster. Not for next year, but maybe the year following. It’s from a hockey perspective, not so much the cap, we need to get these guys off the team.
We can send them to the minors if cap isn't an issue.I think the binding issue will be the 23 man roster. Not for next year, but maybe the year following. It’s from a hockey perspective, not so much the cap, we need to get these guys off the team.
If needed Anderson first.But we’re talking about Anderson and Gallagher, no? The Alzner treatment?
I think a lot of teams ahead of us are taking defensemen. Even if we stay 5th or 6th, we'll have a very good shot at a good forward.Going to be sweet seeing an eventual allstar go to Ottawa or Utah instead because Gally and Armia want to play hockey in the last 10 games
so all of Bradley's panic attacks were for notAs of right now the lowest our pick can be is #8, and that would take some pretty shitty luck.
When has our luck been good?so all of Bradley's panic attacks were for not
We won the 1st overall pick with 25% chance? We got Suzuki even though he wasn’t the player we originally wanted.When has our luck been good?
And we could have drafted Michkov but chose not to. That’s not bad luck. And we drafted third just 6 years ago. Our luck with draft position has been fine, actually.We won the 1st overall pick with 25% chance? We got Suzuki even though he wasn’t the player we originally wanted.
For those interested, my guy Simon Boisvert talks about some of the forward prospects in the WHL.
View: https://youtu.be/EZpv80AyNII?si=OXQyfSjlYtSdCa3r&t=2233
Thinks Lindstrom is a winger at the NHL level and assuming the Habs have the 5th overall pick, thinks it's too high for Lindstrom. He likes Iginla more, but still wouldn't take him in the 5-6 range. Calls Iginla a high floor, but not necessarily a high ceiling, player with minimal chance of flopping.
For Catton, says it's "night and day" between Catton & Lindstrom/Iginla ability wise.
As it stands, assuming Demidov isn't there and Connolly is a no draft at 5, Catton's the only forward he'd take at 5-6. If not Demidov/Catton, he'd take a d-man.
There will probably soon be 33-34 team in the NHL, Harris and Arber can find regular spots on at least a few of them.Harris a mobile low-event D who plays both on the LHS and the RHS. Maybe there’s no place with the Habs, but out of the league? Nah. He’ll be in demand to fill the 5-8 spots.
I don’t get the Xhekaj comment at all.