leafman101
Well-known member
I don’t know how important good veteran leadership is. But I know how important not having bad veterans leadership is. Like “who cares we’re in first” Thornton.
I don’t know how important good veteran leadership is. But I know how important not having bad veterans leadership is. Like “who cares we’re in first” Thornton.
Lamoriello, Dubas and Treliving really couldn’t have brought in worse veteran leaders for this team if they deliberately tried.
Lamoriello, Dubas and Treliving really couldn’t have brought in worse veteran leaders for this team if they deliberately tried.
What could JT teach them other than how to be good at losing and comfortable with it? When you bring in veteran leadership, they cant just be random veterans. They have to be veterans with a proven track record of WINNING.It’s crazy with all the picks and money spent, they couldn’t find anyone that could fit into top 6 with good veteran qualities to support 34 and 88. ROR might have been the closest if he wasnt broken down already.
But in reality, if spending all that money, JT should have been that guy and all those picks and money should have been spent on depth scoring and top 4 dmen.
I don’t think it’s fair to JT. He left $14m on the table and the west coast life to sign here. He was a ufa, which comes at a premium. But instead of being happy to have the luxury of a 1st line C on the second line and a guy who took some of the heat off 34 and 16, they treated his contract as a barometer to measure they’re own value.It’s crazy with all the picks and money spent, they couldn’t find anyone that could fit into top 6 with good veteran qualities to support 34 and 88. ROR might have been the closest if he wasnt broken down already.
But in reality, if spending all that money, JT should have been that guy and all those picks and money should have been spent on depth scoring and top 4 dmen.
They could have just added skill..Its almost like its kind of a made up fairy dust like quality that no one really knows what it actually is.
Or something.
Marner couldn’t be taught anything. He already knew Tavares was going to stay with a discount to try to finish the job and he didn’t give a shit. Veteran players can’t make younger players different guys than their nature allows.Management definitely failed in surrounding 16/34/88 with the right kind of veterans, in addition to all the playoff rentals that haven't lived up to expectations. JT obviously didn't teach Mitch anything about hometown passion, dude's heart was already in Vegas the last 2 playoff runs.
I really hope 34 can turn it around and just go absoulte beast mode like we've seen from Drai and McJ now that some of the poison has been removed from the room.
Marner couldn’t be taught anything. He already knew Tavares was going to stay with a discount to try to finish the job and he didn’t give a shit. Veteran players can’t make younger players different guys than their nature allows.
It was Shanahan me thinks.Lamoriello, Dubas and Treliving really couldn’t have brought in worse veteran leaders for this team if they deliberately tried.
then yeah, it's absolutely meaningless fairy dust.
All those guys developed chips on their shoulders tho. Marner is a crybaby.It's all just very post facto to me. Bennett was a cry baby who got run out of Calgary and within 2 years he's a full on leaderbean for a champion. Marchand was the dangerous weirdo who licked people and lost big games and now he's an uber veteran leader. Tampa was a loser clown show that couldn't win the big game until they weren't. Jack Eichel #1C of a cup team, lol, c'mon bro don't be ridiculous.
It's this thing that gets made up after a guy wins to explain why they won, and doesn't appear to be an actual player trait that anyone predicts is there until afterwards.