Sal_Butera
Well-known member
Gordon: If it’s dumb to make the goalie your best-paid player, why are good teams doing it?
https://theathletic.com/1111386/201...best-paid-player-why-are-good-teams-doing-it/
If one were to be bloody-minded, one might adjust for local taxes and point out that Bobrovsky and Vasilevskiy will reap more actual dollars from their contracts than Price will. But one is not so gauche.
So here’s the question: If this is such a stupid idea and Bergevin is an imbecile for doing it, why is the GM of the planet-smashing, all-conquering Lightning making the same mistake? Or the guy in Florida who built a Cup-winner in Chicago, has crafted an on-the-cusp young team in Sunrise and just hired maybe the best coach in the league?
Perhaps – and hear me out on this – it’s because the conventional wisdom is not so wise. Or at very least, that it does not apply universally.
As with all other generalizations (he generalized), the problems arise from exceptional cases. There are some goalies in the NHL who are, in fact, worth huge dollars. They aren’t many, and doing so is no guarantee of success, but it’s wrong to imagine an élite netminder can’t move the needle meaningfully.
https://theathletic.com/1111386/201...best-paid-player-why-are-good-teams-doing-it/