Around the League 2019-2024 Edition

[zeke]

and Ottawa is already eating a portion of that cash this year.

wait are we sure about that?

 

[MindzEye]

wait are we sure about that?

Pretty, pretty sure

 

[zeke]

Pretty, pretty sure

View attachment 16752

that's the 25% retained caphit.

but does ottawa actually pay 25% of his salary too?

 

[leafman101]

Well at least we know if the Leafs actually go after Hart it’s an analytics based decision unlike Dubas who just picked goalies cause they played in the Soo.

 

[LeafGm]

Sammy probably costs more than Hart, and Hart is probably better.

I mean, sure. If Sammy’s demand comes in above the $3.9M Hart’s making, that’d be one reason to reconsider my choice between those two.

I don’t really think he has the grounds to ask for that much though. And Russians don’t have the leverage they once did with regards to heading back home to the KHL.

 

[LeafGm]

I guess I also wouldn’t mind getting the last Russian off this team. Did feel slightly icky at times cheering him on last season.

 

[LeafOfFaith]

that's the 25% retained caphit.

but does ottawa actually pay 25% of his salary too?

I think if you retain, you pay.

Wouldn't make much sense to retain cap hit without the obligation to pay corresponding dollars.

 

[MindzEye]

that's the 25% retained caphit.

but does ottawa actually pay 25% of his salary too?

Pretty sure that's how it works no, retained caphit is retained salary percentage as well.

 

[zeke]

When a team trades a player, they have the option to retain a part of their salary (and cap hit). The team who retains the salary then pays the retained percentage of the salary, and also retains the percentage of the cap hit until the contract expires. The following requirements must be met to retain salary:

1. The percentage retained cannot exceed 50 percent of the player’s salary (including all bonuses) and Salary Cap Hit.
2. The same percentage must be retained for both the player’s salary and Salary Cap Hit, and cannot be modified.

yeah good.

 

[zeke]

he was good for them but that's rich.

 

[MyNameIsJonas]

at least its only 2 years

 

[worm]

he was good for them but that's rich.

Schenn likes this.

 

[Jeremy]

 

[Wayward DP]

he was good for them but that's rich.

oooooooooooof. that's a lotta coin for an all-D guy who I'm not convinced is even that good at D.

 

[Wayward DP]

Schenn likes this.

if he wants a penny over $1m AAV, then he should obtain it elsewhere.

 

[CH1]

if he wants a penny over $1m AAV, then he should obtain it elsewhere.

 

[LeafOfFaith]

View attachment 16770

Haha. Okay, I'll just need to manufacture a need then.

I liked Schenn, but I also can't bear to see him take any more time away from Lilly. And it pains me, because I know Schenn loves the Leafs and made a big show of being brought back into the fold. But this is business.

 

[Preston]

oooooooooooof. that's a lotta coin for an all-D guy who I'm not convinced is even that good at D.

He was excellent for LA.

 

[leafman101]

Even Tre's defenisve guys have positive offensive impact. Not sure Schenn makes the cut.

Could've seen him go for Gavrikov.

 

[Wayward DP]

An

He was excellent for LA.

And yet the contract is still negative value according to Dom