worm
Well-known member
This is where having a DH leadsClearly hockey needs to evolve
Blernball >
![]()
This is where having a DH leadsClearly hockey needs to evolve
Blernball >
![]()
Agreed. 3x3 for 5 minutes, and then it goes into the books as a tie, and no one gets the point
There is nothing interesting whatsoever about ties. They're lame, boring, and unsatisfying.
no, but still better than a damn, dirty tie
Baseball determines a winner with extra innings, but it's unfair to ask hockey players to skate for 5-6 hours in the regular season with a plane on the tarmac and a game the next night.No. A regular season tie is better than deciding the game with a HR contest, a field goal kicking contest, etc.
Baseball determines a winner with extra innings, but it's unfair to ask hockey players to skate for 5-6 hours in the regular season with a plane on the tarmac and a game the next night.
3v3 is super fun, albeit annoying as fuck when you lose, pretty much whichever way you lose it is a guaranteed piss-off.For the record I love 3 on 3 and I love the strategic element of it, including the back passing and methodical buildups. North American sports are about direct attacking so I get why many would find it dull but there's a soccer element to OT that I've grown to appreciate.
And then of course you still get scoring chances galore compared to 5 on 5 so not much to complain about for me. Adding more time would be nice, even if just a couple minutes.
If you got to a 10 minute OT, whatever it looks like, I bet 95% of games end with a winner.It's also unfair to ask pitchers to have their fucking arms fall off from massive overuse when an entire team's pitching staff gets used in one game.
There's nothing wrong with calling it a tie in the regular season.
only if the sens movedIsn’t it like the Leafs offering to play in Ottawa though?
Funny thing is they are telling Teachers and Nurses there is no $ for them.Everbody hates the habs.