Just move on , he can be replaced with a 1 mil UFA now
Around The League - 2024-25 Regular Season
- Thread starter GGpX
- Start date
Just move on , he can be replaced with a 1 mil UFA now
Sal_Butera
Well-known member
Carey Price’s replacement according to “some poster” on draft day…. is KHL bound:
Krust claimed he was the guy to win us our next cup iirc
Sal_Butera
Well-known member
Mea Culpa
one is allowed to be wrong every once on awhile
Habsy
Not playing around anymore.
That's why both of me are never wrong!
GGpX
Well-known member
Source: Flyers-Canes trade held up by CBA quirk
The Flyers' attempt to trade defenseman Tony DeAngelo back to the Hurricanes and retain some of his salary is being held up by a CBA clause, a source told ESPN.
GrandWazoo
Well-known member
Not sure I follow, are you saying that you'd be willing to pay a 2nd rd pick for DeAngelo at 50%? Flyers are not paying the Hurricanes to take him at 50%.
worm
Well-known member
I think he means for a second rounder the Habs would be the third team and just retain the salary
GrandWazoo
Well-known member
Got it, but I don’t think Philly is interested in paying anyone to retain salary.
GGpX
Well-known member
lol what
They were able to dump Hall and Chicago didn't get a single draft pick in return?
What a fucking fitting team for Taylor Hall. He's going to spend >75% of his career on shit teams.
Last edited:
GGpX
Well-known member
Bet you Carolina might be.
Philly gets: ??? A lower-level prospect from Montréal?
Carolina gets: Tony DeAngelo @ 50%
Montréal gets: Carolina 2nd rounder
GrandWazoo
Well-known member
I thought the trade was already DeAngelo at 50% for a lower-level prospect from Carolina??? What value is Montreal adding?
GGpX
Well-known member
The CBA is preventing Philthydelphia from trading DeAngelo to Carolina with a salary retention:
Rule 50.5 of the NHL CBA protects against a team trading a player, having another team pick up a percentage of their salary, and then quickly reacquiring that player at a reduced cap cost. It states that "under no circumstances may a Club reacquire, as part of a Retained Salary Transaction, the contract of a player who was on that Club's Reserve List within the past calendar year."
So for the Flyers to be able to do the trade, they'd need to trade him to somewhere (like Montréal), they retain 50%, and they send him to Carolina. At least that's my understanding.
Unless Philthydelphia can hold on to 50% of the salary, trade him to Montréal, then Montréal trades him to Carolina?
Rule 50.5 of the NHL CBA protects against a team trading a player, having another team pick up a percentage of their salary, and then quickly reacquiring that player at a reduced cap cost. It states that "under no circumstances may a Club reacquire, as part of a Retained Salary Transaction, the contract of a player who was on that Club's Reserve List within the past calendar year."
So for the Flyers to be able to do the trade, they'd need to trade him to somewhere (like Montréal), they retain 50%, and they send him to Carolina. At least that's my understanding.
Unless Philthydelphia can hold on to 50% of the salary, trade him to Montréal, then Montréal trades him to Carolina?