lecoqsportif
Well-known member
has to be 50% and give us something to do it
Even so… he’s old, expensive and signed until the end of time.
Ick.
has to be 50% and give us something to do it
St. Louis can drum him into shapeEven so… he’s old, expensive and signed until the end of time.
Ick.
+ takes Gallagher’s contractThe gift that keeps on giving.
I might be crazy enough to think about taking on Jonathan Huberdeau if Calgary withheld enough of his salary. Something like 35-40%.
Kweefe is feeling the heat, now throwing goalies under bus
I was saying earlier that Calgary would definitely consider a Gallagher-Huberdeau trade. I wouldn’t from Montreal perspective. But I might consider that trade with 40-50% retention on Huberdeau.The gift that keeps on giving.
I might be crazy enough to think about taking on Jonathan Huberdeau if Calgary withheld enough of his salary. Something like 35-40%.
A straight up Huberdeau for Gallagher trade doesn't interest me in the least. I'd do it without blinking if I was Calgary, though, simply because of the term remaining (7 years for Huberdeau, 3 for Gallagher).I was saying earlier that Calgary would definitely consider a Gallagher-Huberdeau trade. I wouldn’t from Montreal perspective. But I might consider that trade with 40-50% retention on Huberdeau.
Flames would save 4 years , they would nuts not to make the trade at 50% retentionI was saying earlier that Calgary would definitely consider a Gallagher-Huberdeau trade. I wouldn’t from Montreal perspective. But I might consider that trade with 40-50% retention on Huberdeau.
I have lost faith in Huberdeau. Its been such a long stretch of mediocrity, can he snap out of it playing for us? I'm not confident.A straight up Huberdeau for Gallagher trade doesn't interest me in the least. I'd do it without blinking if I was Calgary, though, simply because of the term remaining (7 years for Huberdeau, 3 for Gallagher).
Huberdeau @ $6.5M ($4M retention for Calgary) for Gallagher straight up? I'd think long & hard about it.
Unfortunately SEC schools don't have hockey programs.you have to try really hard to become academically ineligible.
Don't we already have enough offensive players who are producing little to no offense as it is?The gift that keeps on giving.
I might be crazy enough to think about taking on Jonathan Huberdeau if Calgary withheld enough of his salary. Something like 35-40%.
Yes, but Huberdeau didn't suddenly forget how to play hockey overnight. I just don't think Calgary's a good fit for him.Don't we already have enough offensive players who are producing little to no offense as it is?
There is no rush rebuild , Hugo hasn’t made 1 bad move to indicate this .Yes, but Huberdeau didn't suddenly forget how to play hockey overnight. I just don't think Calgary's a good fit for him.
Also, if this team was ran the way I wanted it, I'd never even think about getting Huberdeau. However, since we're trying to rush through the rebuild prematurely and probably push to make the playoffs consistently as of next year, he's a player I would think about. Especially at $6.5M.
I think Huberdeau yearns for a non traditional hockey market - misses the anonymity…Yes, but Huberdeau didn't suddenly forget how to play hockey overnight. I just don't think Calgary's a good fit for him.
Also, if this team was ran the way I wanted it, I'd never even think about getting Huberdeau. However, since we're trying to rush through the rebuild prematurely and probably push to make the playoffs consistently as of next year, he's a player I would think about. Especially at $6.5M.
Alex Newhook says hello. As I explained in the other thread, trading for him was completely meaningless when you examine the timeline of everything that needs to happen for a rebuild.There is no rush rebuild , Hugo hasn’t made 1 bad move to indicate this .
They haven’t moved assets or draft capital to get aging vets
View: https://x.com/Senators/status/1741519599797936195?s=20
No more Poulin on our TSN broadcasts is an added bonus, maybe they can hire Garry Galley too?