probably at least 1 other team was willing to match 6x$4.i really thought term should get Tanev under $4m. and i'm not sure why if you go 6yrs you wouldn't go 8, given you're not expecting him to play even the full 6yrs.
not an overpay in caphit, but an overpay in term. not sure term will burn us in the end tho anyways.
i really thought term should get Tanev under $4m. and i'm not sure why if you go 6yrs you wouldn't go 8, given you're not expecting him to play even the full 6yrs.
not an overpay in caphit, but an overpay in term. not sure term will burn us in the end tho anyways.
Its just wildly stupid and ineffecient.Couldn't go 8, even though we had his rights he wasn't on some player list that you can't add to. But we could have gone 7.
And yes, every way I've looked at the math of this, unless his projection was way the fuck off and the expectation was 6-6.5 x 3, there's no way going 6-7 years shouldn't have brought this down into the high 3's.
Couldn't go 8, even though we had his rights he wasn't on some player list that you can't add to. But we could have gone 7.
And yes, every way I've looked at the math of this, unless his projection was way the fuck off and the expectation was 6-6.5 x 3, there's no way going 6-7 years shouldn't have brought this down into the high 3's.
Its just wildly stupid and ineffecient.
That said, i think its possible he would have had a 6 AAV value on the market. Pesce got 5.5, and i think Tanev could be seen as better.
OEL is going to get like 3.5 to 4 and its going to sting.
Tanev is a Toronto boy. Couldn’t get himto take the hometown discountlube up before he fucked us unfortunately.
Not moving any of Tavares/Kampf/Jarnkrok is a disaster. Reaves we can bury at least
I'm sure he was seen as better. But he's also 34.