TT and Gallagher are underpaid and Anderson is overpaid.Was just about to post that worm. Those are great numbers. I'm feeling a bit better about the deal.
Dom is the best...he spends majority of his time trying to explain why his model was inaccurateSo refreshing how successful we have been with these great Microsoft stat sheets over the years and our great showing in our many playoff runs
If the statistical model pins Gallagher’s value at over $10M in 2020, it probably means the model is inherently flawed...Was just about to post that worm. Those are great numbers. I'm feeling a bit better about the deal
For some reasons his model seems to think that shooting from any angle makes you an elite offensive player.If the statistical model pins Gallagher’s value at over $10M in 2020, it probably means the model is inherently flawed...
Which then punishes someone like Anderson from a recency bias perspective, who in his first 3-full NHL seasons had an avg 12.5% shooting % but last injury riddled season was a ridiculous 1.6%...For some reasons his model seems to think that shooting from any angle makes you an elite offensive player.
Climate denierSo refreshing how successful we have been with these great Microsoft stat sheets over the years and our great showing in our many playoff runs
If we get 4 good years, that's sufficient for me.now do the next 6 yrs...
If we get 4 good years, that's sufficient for me.
well no but it does take corsi, etc into accountFor some reasons his model seems to think that shooting from any angle makes you an elite offensive player.