GDT: Canes @ Canucks 10/24 10:30

[cmaleski2]

You just knew Vancouver was scoring after that failed challenge.

 

[CanadaCanes]

Teuravainen has looked like dog shit so far this season, really bad.

 

[andyt]

So back to the call, if they’re waving off the goal, it has to be a penalty for interference. But they ruled incidental contact. If the contact was incidental that didn’t rise to a penalty, the goal has to count.

 

[cmon3]

I don’t like that rule. But it was silly to challenge. You’ve got momentum not worth the risk.

 

[andyt]

Teuravainen has looked like dog shit so far this season, really bad.

Don’t insult dog shit that way.

 

[andyt]

I don’t like that rule. But it was silly to challenge. You’ve got momentum not worth the risk.

Yeah, it was never better than 50/50 and you shouldn’t take a chance on a coin flip.

 

[Tryamw]

Hey.. I'm still bitter about that GI against Boston.. Not a hand pass cause the goalie possessed it but the goalie didn't posses it so not covered..

 

[cmon3]

Don’t insult dog shit that way.

Not even hot dog shit

 

[CanadaCanes]

The thing that is really bothersome about saying that’s no goal is you will watch two more this week in the league worst than that and they will say no goalie interference and call it ok. The inconsistency is constant and most players and coaches will tell you no one really knows from one game to the next what’s a good goal.

 

[cmon3]

The thing that is really bothersome about saying that’s no goal is you will watch two more this week in the league worst than that and they will say no goalie interference and call it ok. The inconsistency is constant and most players and coaches will tell you no one really knows from one game to the next what’s a good goal.

Which is why it’s not a good challenge. It’s a total gamble. They’re not going to overrule themselves unless they think they were wrong or if they were obviously wrong.

 

[Tryamw]

Chatfield has better wheels then I thought that's one thing this game has shown me.

 

[andyt]

Here is the ruling from the War Room.

 

[CanadaCanes]

Which is why it’s not a good challenge. It’s a total gamble. They’re not going to overrule themselves unless they think they were wrong or if they were obviously wrong.

There also not going to overrule themselves when they have no clue what goalie interference is from one game to the next.

 

[Tryamw]

Here is the ruling from the War Room.

Clear as Mud... On the bottom of the ocean as you look to the earth's core..

 

[cmon3]

It has to be blatantly wrong for them to overturn it and even then sometimes they don’t. And that was marginal. I think stastnys skat staying on the post also kept goalies skate from getting to the post.

why not just ride the momentum.

 

[cmon3]

What is up with Burns. He’s been dismal.

 

[CanadaCanes]

Canes are working on dropping a real turd again tonight, what a disjointed mess, be better!

 

[cmon3]

Now our goofballs are proposing rules about icing

 

[cmon3]

Be nice if we stepped up on them running our best players.

 

[Tryamw]

Well Vancouver seems to know that we don't like to go to the center of the ice..