I lean toward BPA.Admittedly I don’t have an overly informed opinion on the draft. I just always lean to centre over winger.
I lean toward BPA.Admittedly I don’t have an overly informed opinion on the draft. I just always lean to centre over winger.
hell 15% is excellent
Who’s Gallagher?that's how far Gallagher has fallen...doesn't even warrant a mention among the missing
Slaf has 5 pts in his last 10 games, with 3 pts in his last 4 games.Wright had some good chances in the first. He could have had a hat trick. I thought we should have picked him. Hope I’m wrong.
Which is incredible since most goalies today are a minimum 6’3”/6’4”. Just shows how skilled and FAST young players are today compared to the past. The modern sticks help too.Not sure if anyone saw a recent NHL goalie stat:
Over last 8-seasons (15-16 to end of last week inclusive), the median sv % overall league wide has dropped from .914 to .906.
Trend suggests a need to re-baseline G performance expectations …
the guy who should off been traded for a Pacioretty returnWho’s Gallagher?
and recovered from the goal with .1 to goAlso I find this current version of the Habs team seems to exhibit a strong capacity to learn from their errors. Despite not having 2-minute eating vets (Money-hands & Savard), team didn’t repeat the same errors as the night before in Van.
A very small & limited data point, but that trend seems to be repeating thus far this season - team game shows a penchant for learning from its mistakes
Side note - What’s also incredible was Price’s league leading .930 playoff sv % over that period (for min 25GP)Which is incredible since most goalies today are a minimum 6’3”/6’4”. Just shows how skilled and FAST young players are today compared to the past. The modern sticks help too.
If he keeps it up, he'll finish with the highest shooting percentage this millennium. Nobody since the early 90s has even flirted with his current number.Keep trying to convince yourself of that. Suzuki tends to only shoot from high danger areas anyway.
I don’t think he’ll finish at 27 percent. But high teens is not impossible and Caufield should have more multiple goal games than he currently does, so that line should keep producing at a high rate.If he keeps it up, he'll finish with the highest shooting percentage thin millennium. Nobody since the early 90s has even flirted with his current number.
Good luck.
Well, I was quoting a post where you told 'coq to "keep telling yourself that" when he suggested that Suzuki will likely finish around 20%.I don’t think he’ll finish at 27 percent. But high teens is not impossible and Caufield should have more multiple goal games than he currently does, so that line should keep producing at a high rate.
At this point I'd be surprised if he didn't finish in the 20% range, or better.
Yes, and probably.The point is:
a) They are in 18th place overall, but even this ranking is decoupled from stats.
b) They had a relatively easy schedule thus far.
c) They were kinda free from problematic injuries until Monahan. (I’m not sure what to think about the of Matheson’s injury.) All team get injuries, but the Habs don’t have the horses to paper over major losses.
So, 18th is an unsustainable peak, I think. I see them sliding to the 22-26 range.
They did take 5-of-8 points on the West Coast swingThe point is:
a) They are in 18th place overall, but even this ranking is decoupled from stats.
b) They had a relatively easy schedule thus far.
c) They were kinda free from problematic injuries until Monahan. (I’m not sure what to think about the of Matheson’s injury.) All team get injuries, but the Habs don’t have the horses to paper over major losses.
So, 18th is an unsustainable peak, I think. I see them sliding to the 22-26 range.
I read a few days ago that the Habs have the “most difficult” remaining schedule.Kracken were a weak team? Someone remind me.
They did take 5-of-8 points on the West Coast swing