Perfect synopsis of the game - now I don't have to say anything.View attachment 26227
Jarvis is the man
Anderson was
Martinook is one of the most unheralded guys in the league for what he does night in and night out
Svech did a lot of really good things… Really good things
This was not a boring game
Perfect synopsis of the game - now I don't have to say anything.
I missed it in the arena, but rewatched part of the broadcast and saw it. It was helmet to helmet and no big deal - but what an Oscar-winning performance by Timo Meier, who started it and deserved a lot more. He's been doing this crap in both games this series.Also. After looking at the replay I hope the league doesn’t suspend Burns for that head butt. I guess that might get us some Nikishin……or Morrow
Can any of you unpack the Haula hate? I know he scored a ton of goals to start. Got hurt maybe. Heard locker room cancer then traded but don't know anything specific.
They won't for the playoffs. They were both wearing helmets and it wasn't that hard. Meier flopping his head back like a movie star getting shot.Also. After looking at the replay I hope the league doesn’t suspend Burns for that head butt. I guess that might get us some Nikishin……or Morrow
but why?Rod should consider dressing 7 D men, and keeping Burns on the bench until it's PP time. He played one 24 second shift in game 82. So he should be fine just playing on the PP for at least one or two games this series.
Honestly, I just think he should take him off of the PP and let him concentrate on his 5v5 minutes. His shot has lost sufficient zip that nobody's playing him to do anything other than pass these days, so he's getting nothing done on the PP anyway. Rod's stubborn though ... and that's both a good and a bad thing. Fans get hung up on the bad side of the ledger, because ... they're fans.but why?
Burns has 3 PP points on the year. Let me re-state that, he has 3 PP points in 84 games. Putting him on the PP is malfeasance at this point.
Meh ... that's just how this matchup has gone over two games. Aho's line was pretty bad in Game 1, but they were very good in all situations in Game 2 and the other groups have been pretty consistent. And who exactly makes up Carolina's top 2 lines anyway? The top 3 lines get pretty much equal ice time at even strength unless the other team is pushing their 1st line on the road, in which case Staal's line plays more. All those line number shorthands really don't mean much in general, but with a Brind'Amour team they mean even less. And in the playoffs, these things ebb and flow. Just get enough goals to win the game.In two games the Canes have 1 even strength goal from a forward (Stanky) and zero non-EN goals from the top 2 lines. Do I have that right? I’m no believer in the “top 2 lines cancel and depth scoring wins” adage but if ever there was a case to make that point ….
It's a good question. IMO, the way Freddie is playing now, you cannot take him out. If he begins to falter, then you go with Kooch and see if his game has improved.And the next question is does RBA ever put Koochie in to see where his heads at and if he can do anything, or just continue to trot Freddie out every game and wear him out if we go another round? Kind of a no win situation either way with the way Kooch finished the season
Short version ...Can any of you unpack the Haula hate? I know he scored a ton of goals to start. Got hurt maybe. Heard locker room cancer then traded but don't know anything specific.