Yeah... that is really dumb. I'm astounded at some of the stupidity spewed around here in regards to Plekanec.
I'm amazed at the stupidity spewed around the thought that if we trade Plek we become a weaker team....
I'm amazed at the stupidity spewed around the thought that if we trade Plek we become a weaker team....
I'm not amazed. This is a hockey forum.
So I guess you want to re-sign 14 for another five years because that's he'll want, and will probably get from some team. I think I'll pass on that. 27 is better offensively and 81 is fine defensively. The team will survive the loss of 14.
I have a better idea.
Keep Pleks and get rid of Lars "Playoff Warrior" Eller who doesn't do a single thing better than Pleks. The only thing he has on Pleks is his size.
Sounds smart given that 14 is almost mid-30's and 81 is 26. Very smart.
ExactlyI have a better idea.
Keep Pleks and get rid of Lars "Playoff Warrior" Eller who doesn't do a single thing better than Pleks. The only thing he has on Pleks is his size.
Except Eller is a worse player.Sounds smart given that 14 is almost mid-30's and 81 is 26. Very smart.
Hey... maybe we can get an 18 year old capable of 3g and 12 points... that's even better!!!
Eller is younger than Pleks, but Plekanec is a vastly superior in every facet of the game. It's not even remotely close.
You don't know what they would get for him but regardless, I don't like to let assets just leave for nothing.
So you're prepared to offer him five more years?
He wouldn't be leaving for nothing. His departure would free up $5 million worth of cap space that they can use to sign a better player.
So that's the only option? 5 years or nothing?
How about 3 years? What a concept!!!! Wow!!!
I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to 5 years at like $5M either though. He's shown no signs of slowing down yet. He's 32, I see no reason why he couldn't still be quite good for the majority if not all of that contract.