WeHaveMoreCupsThanYou
I will get banned again soon, worry not.
Well, Slaf is apparently over it.The mental flu. He's still sulking over the Slafkovsky thing in practice.
Well, Slaf is apparently over it.The mental flu. He's still sulking over the Slafkovsky thing in practice.
here is a post from two years ago…PLD is so frustrating. Has shown flashes but can't stay healthy. Needs to move to the wing on the third line to provide more depth scoring.
If PLD had the Laine term he might have tried ........ 7 more years at big money wasnt touchedhere is a post from two years ago…
Yup. Reasons. Don't tell me it's difficult though.here is a post from two years ago…
It's difficultYup. Reasons. Don't tell me it's difficult though.
I would have been disappointed if you hadn't worm.It's difficult
True. Which is why I want a mixed approach. Spend the assets or money to get a number 2 guy that will likely fall to a number 3 over the course of the contract. Then have some additional options for a future number 2.Acquiring players is easy. Acquiring the right player at the right price is hard.
I think Hughes will use Hage as trade leverage.I have hopes that Hage might be our future #2. But we would need that #2 that falls to #3. Bennett would fit that bill but I doubt he signs here, and wouldn't break the bank for him but I'd be comfortable offering between 6-7 over a 5-6 years contract. Well comfortable, not really, there is definitely some risks, but he'd be a good fit.
Hope not. And actually kinda doubt it, but if he does, it'd better be for a sure thing.
About a zero percent chance of that.
I think his game, and speed, complements Demidov.I have hopes that Hage might be our future #2. But we would need that #2 that falls to #3. Bennett would fit that bill but I doubt he signs here, and wouldn't break the bank for him but I'd be comfortable offering between 6-7 over a 5-6 years contract. Well comfortable, not really, there is definitely some risks, but he'd be a good fit.
No
Almost no chance. HuGo have demonstrated that they value narratives like the one Hage has, assuming of course, that you have the talent, which he does. They are the antithesis of MB: “If you want loyalty, get a dog.”
no to BenoI have hopes that Hage might be our future #2. But we would need that #2 that falls to #3. Bennett would fit that bill but I doubt he signs here, and wouldn't break the bank for him but I'd be comfortable offering between 6-7 over a 5-6 years contract. Well comfortable, not really, there is definitely some risks, but he'd be a good fit.
More and more “insiders” believe Hage will become a W vs C at NHL levelI have hopes that Hage might be our future #2. But we would need that #2 that falls to #3. Bennett would fit that bill but I doubt he signs here, and wouldn't break the bank for him but I'd be comfortable offering between 6-7 over a 5-6 years contract. Well comfortable, not really, there is definitely some risks, but he'd be a good fit.