ahhhh....therein lies the rub.
I just went with their listed ages on db....not really too pertinent either way, more interested in their rookie/sophmore seasons being so incredibly similar.
This is where I get lost in the Staal argument.
1:54 & 2:19 (totals from last 2 seasons) PP time per game is not "very little" PP time, it's just not. Don't get me wrong, it's not a ton by any stretch, but I just don't see an increase of 1+ minutes of PP time increasing his scoring rates by 20+ points per season.
What has Staal done with his 346 minutes of PP time over the last 2 seasons?
3 ****ing PP goals
Flanking Kessel and Kulemin / Stralberg / UFA we bring in this summer instead of Dupuis and Talbot would be a good startI'm just really curious where this additional 15 points is coming from...and that's just to get him to the bottom end of the 70-80 point range being argued.
I could give a shit if he scores 0 goals. As long as he is a beast down low and feeds the guys like Kessel who can score, I'll be a happy man.
We're not talking about the Pens 1st line centre in exchange for Kabs, but their 3rd line centre.
He would be a number one on a minimum of 25 teams in the league right now.
Yeah, it was weird and took me about 30 minutes of looking at numbers to start to realize it. There was very little correlation between pre draft numbers and NHL offensive success, but that first post draft year, there's almost no exceptions. It's almost a pre requisite that to score 30 goals or 60 points in the NHL you have to be at least 1.2ppg as a CHL product in that first post draft season.
Very, very few exceptions, somewhere along the lines of 2% over the last 12 seasons.
Flanking Kessel and Kulemin / Stralberg / UFA we bring in this summer instead of Dupuis and Talbot would be a good start
There's some serious value even if that's the top. Every contending team should have a guy like that running the second line.Nah, he's clearly a 2nd line calibre centre right now, the question is whether or not he has the offensive chops to be a 1st line centre or if his career upside is just that of a fantastic 2 way 2nd line centre.
May be a worthwhile exercise to compile all the players who score over 1.2 ppg their post draft year.....then break that group into tiers based on level of ppg production.
Give us some odds on what a players future upside may be, based on post draft year production.
it's like comparing L.Schenn and T.Myers based on their first couple of years - in both cases, one was an early physically developed kid playing topline minutes almost immediately, while the other was a pubescent kid still growing and playing in a much less prominent role.
I dunno ME. Kessel's old linemate took a 22 points dip in his production paced over 82 games when Kessel left.15 points is a lot to make up in line mate bias.
There's just so many example of players who go from mediocre linemates to top end linemates and don't see their scoring go up significantly.
Good offensive hockey players make those around them slightly better, mediocre offensive players are only made slightly better by good offensive players.
Once in a while you find guys who just click together and put numbers up significantly higher than anything else they've done in any other situation, but that's the exception and not the rule imo.
No he wouldn't, Arty. Come on man.
There's some serious value even if that's the top. Every contending team should have a guy like that running the second line.
Plus, you put him out there to kill penalties with Sjostrom and Phaneuf, and suddenly a penalty kill that was a historical embarrassment has the potential to be one of the best in the league.