Or, you could play the fuck out of the top 4, and shelter the shit out of the bottom pair, and not worry too much about Klingberg at 5v5.McCabe is fine and paid fine as a 3rd pairing guy
Rielly-Brodie
XXXXX-Lilly
McCabe-Gio
If you slot a guy who can handle the heavies into that spot with Lilly, that's a really good blueline 1-6.
I'm horny for a Brodie-Weegar pairing I think. If that's the guy they get they'll have to shift Brodie to the left side which is fine.McCabe is fine and paid fine as a 3rd pairing guy
Rielly-Brodie
XXXXX-Lilly
McCabe-Gio
If you slot a guy who can handle the heavies into that spot with Lilly, that's a really good blueline 1-6.
Agree, it's more likely to be just Klingberg. Want a good established D? It has to be him that goes, sorry. He's an expiring contract, so fairly easily movable, and I can't imagine they didn't at least discuss the possibility of having to trade him if it doesn't work out like it hasn't for him in the past few years. Otherwise that would be negligent.There's no likelihood that both Klingberg and McCabe get dealt.
And I doubt they trade Klingberg after Tre just signed him for 1 year. It's a bad look.
You guys will waste a lot of keystrokes planning his departure.
Or, you could play the fuck out of the top 4, and shelter the shit out of the bottom pair, and not worry too much about Klingberg at 5v5.