It's not particularly close. Klingberg hasn't been an adequate NHL defender in like four seasons. McCabe has been quite good in most years.Does anyone really think McCabe is more useful than Klingberg?
We could've used a little less D, and a little more O, from the blueline against Florida.It's not particularly close. Klingberg hasn't been an adequate NHL defender in like four seasons. McCabe has been quite good in most years.
Weegar/anderson/hanafin?
Do we want the guy who will be 30 shortly and is signed til he is 37?
I wouldn't say at least. I'd say we need one, to replace McCabe.
I suppose they'll get one other dman too just to be safe, and if following last year's blueprint, three more after that for maximum comfort and security. The tampax of NHL D, which was, not coincidentally, a pussy strategy.
Well yeah, but I sense a smidge of sarcasm in your post, as if you don’t think that’s really the best approach?They key is to make sure we acquire enough shitty bottom-pairing and depth defenseman that we push the likes of Liljegren & Timmins right out of our playoff lineup.