Muzzin year 1 (from Feb 1 trade to end of season):
1. Rielly 33gms, EV 38.4toi% (-3.1dzs%), 51.8xgf%, 0.84p1/60, 1.21p/60
2. Muzzin 30gms, EV 35.7toi% (+2.4dzs%), 53.4xgf%, 0.67p1/60, 1.22p/60
3. Hainsey 32gms, EV 34.9toi% (+0.7dzs%), 51.3xgf%, 0.21p1/60, 0.64p/60
4. Zaitsev 32gms, EV 33.7toi% (+4.0dzs%), 49.6xgf%, 0.33p1/60, 0.88p/60
Playoffs
1. Rielly 7gms, 41.7toi% (-0.4dzs%), 57.1xgf% (+7.0rel), 1.22p1/60, 1.63p/60
2. Muzzin 7gms, 35.6toi% (+4.3dzs%), 45.0xgf% (-6.7rel), 0.95p1/60, 0.95p/60
3. Hainsey 7gms, 34.2toi% (+6.1dzs%), 57.2xgf% (+6.0rel), 0.00p1/60, 0.49p/60
4. Zaitsev 7gms, 31.4toi% (+3.8dzs%), 54.4xgf% (+2.7rel), 0.00p1/60, 0.00p/60
Muzzin year 2
1. Rielly 47gms, EV 38.1toi% (-3.0dzs%), 51.4xgf% (-0.2rel), 0.66p1/60, 1.20p/60
2. Barrie 70gms, EV 36.9toi% (-5.4dzs%), 50.4xgf% (-1.4rel), 0.68p1/60, 1.15p/60
3. Muzzin 53gms, EV 36.6toi% (+4.0dzs%), 52.4xgf% (+0.7rel), 0.74p1/60, 1.28p/60
4. Holl 68gms, EV 32.1toi% (+4.7dzs%), 53.6xgf% (+1.5rel), 0.38p1/60, 0.92p/60
Muzz missed the playoffs with injury.
Muzzin year 3
1. Rielly 55gms, EV 39.2toi% (-3.4dzs%), 55.1xgf% (-0.6rel), 0.55p1/60, 1.17p/60
2. Brodie 56gms, EV 37.5toi% (-1.7dzs%), 56.0xgf% (+0.1rel), 0.23p1/60, 0.63p/60
3. Muzzin 53gms, EV 35.6toi% (+2.2dzs%), 56.7xgf% (+0.9rel), 0.70p1/60, 1.39p/60
4. Holl 55gms, EV 35.7toi% (+0.0dzs%), 54.2xgf% (-1.8rel), 0.55p1/60, 1.04p/60
Playoffs
1. Rielly 7gms, 43.0toi% (-9.2dzs%), 71.6xgf% (+9.1rel), 0.40p1/60, 0.80p/60
2. Brodie 7gms, 39.6toi% (-4.8dzs%), 67.9xgf% (+7.1rel), 0.44p1/60, 0.87p/60
3. Muzzin 6gms, 31.2toi% (+3.3dzs%), 44.6xgf% (-7.9rel), 1.31p1/60, 1.96p/60
4. Holl 7gms, 36.8toi% (-3.6dzs%), 44.0xgf% (-6.7rel), 0.47p1/60, 0.47p/60
Muzzin year 4
1. Rielly 82gms, EV 36.8toi% (-0.6dzs%), 53.0xgf% (-3.4rel), 1.10p1/60, 1.57p/60
2. Brodie 82gms, EV 36.7toi% (-0.1dzs%), 55.1xgf% (-0.9rel), 0.55p1/60, 0.95p/60
3. Muzzin 47gms, EV 34.7toi% (+2.4dzs%), 53.2xgf% (-3.0rel), 0.51p1/60, 0.95p/60
4. Holl 69gms, EV 34.2toi% (+3.5dzs%), 55.4xgf% (-0.4rel), 0.40p1/60, 1.00p/60
Playoffs
1. Brodie 7gms, 37.8toi% (+2.3dzs%), 55.8xgf% (+3.9rel),
2. Muzzin 7gms, 37.7toi% (+1.8dzs%), 50.6xgf% (-1.0rel),
3. Rielly 7gms, 36.4toi% (-6.2dzs%), 50.1xgf% (+0.4rel),
4. Boosh 7gms, 28.5toi% (+2.1dzs%), 46.0xgf% (-4.4rel),
Kinda dissappointing to see how poor Muzz was in the playoffs overall, though much of that was due to injury. He still produced offensively in the playoffs though. During the regular season he was pretty great until that last season where he probably shouldn't have been trying to play through the conkies. Interesting thing about Muzz was always how effective he was offensively which drove his numbers probably more than his defense. But injuries were always an issue with Muzz, and not just the conkies.
McCabe year 1 (from March 1 trade on)
1. Brodie 20gms, EV 35.6toi% (+3.0dzs%), 58.0xgf%, 0.17p1/60, 0.68p/60
2. McCabe 21gms, EV 34.4toi% (+0.9dzs%), 54.0xgf%, 0.51p1/60, 0.84p/60
3. Rielly 20gms, 32.3toi% (-4.1dzs%), 46.3xgf%, 0.93p1/60, 1.12p/60
4. Holl 21gms, 30.2toi% (+7.4dzs%), 54.0xgf%, 0.19p1/60, 0.96p/60
Playoffs
1. Rielly 11gms, EV 37.5toi% (-5.1dzs%), 56.7xgf% (+4.1rel), 1.61p1/60, 2.68p/60
2. Brodie 11gms, EV 37.1toi% (+8.9dzs%), 54.9xgf% (+5.3rel), 0.54p1/60, 0.81p/60
3. McCabe 11gms, EV 35.6toi% (+7.1dzs%), 47.3xgf% (-3.5rel), 0.28p1/60, 0.56p/60
4. Schenn 11gms, EV -30.6toi% (-2.7dzs%), 59.5xgf% (+7.7rel), 0.33p1/60, 0.33p/60
McCabe year 2
1. Rielly 72gms, EV 39.1toi% (-3.3dzs%), 51.1xgf% (-1.6rel), 1.01p1/60, 1.52p/60
2. Brodie 78gms, EV 36.7toi% (+0.6dzs%), 51.0xgf% (-1.6rel), 0.41p1/60, 0.95p/60
3. McCabe 73gms, EV 35.2toi% (+3.9dzs%), 52.9xgf% (+0.5rel), 0.65p1/60, 1.07p/60
4. Benoit 64gms, EV 30.4toi% (+5.9dzs%), 51.9xgf% (-1.0rel), 0.06p1/60, 0.24p/60
Playoffs
1. Rielly 7gms, EV 39.0toi% (-6.5dzs%), 54.6xgf% (+7.3rel), 0.44p1/60, 1.33p/60
2. McCabe 7gms EV 34.8toi% (+8.2dzs%), 52.4xgf% (+5.4rel), 0.50p1/60, 0.50p/60
3. Benoit 7gms, EV 31.6toi% (+14.8dzs%), 41.9xgf% (-5.1rel), 0.00p1/60, 0.00p/60
4. Edmundson 7gms, EV 32.2toi% (-1.2dzs%), 45.3xgf% (+0.3rel), 0.00p1/60, 0.54p/60
McCabe's been really good for us other than that first playoffs (also his first ever playoffs). He's not quite as effective offensively as Muzz, but he's no slouch there. His numbers seem to be driven more by defense though. Injuries were a big issue for him early in his career but not so much the last few years.
For me both are at a very similar level at the same age - both guys I would classify as very good tough-usage two-way #2/3 dmen.
Other notes:
- gdamn Mo is a playoffs beast
- wtf happened to Brodie last year. fell right off a cliff. bizarre.