leafman101
Well-known member
In any event, signing John Tavares was never the reason we didn't win anything.
It also wasn't a reason we won something, so 7 years later whats the point exactly?
In any event, signing John Tavares was never the reason we didn't win anything.
Since 2018-19 Tavares ranks
Regular season:
Goals: 18th
Points: 25th
xgf%: 77th
Playoffs
Games: 195th
Goals: 76th
Points: 108th
xgf%: 184th
Money paid: 2nd
Like what are we even talking about? We paid a really good regular season player, that stunk in the playoffs like McDavid or Matthews.
And it didn't work. Period.
The same way that Marner, Matty, and a lesser extent Nylander, have all been A reason, sure.It wasn't THE reason. THE reason doesn't exist. But it definitely was A reason.
It also wasn't a reason we won something, so 7 years later whats the point exactly?
The same way that Marner, Matty, and a lesser extent Nylander, have all been A reason, sure.
So trade everyone, why just focus on him?It also wasn't a reason we won something, so 7 years later whats the point exactly?
You've come up with this fictional narrative that he was supposed to be the best of the four. And the only reason you're doing that is because you're hung up on the $11M. The other three were better than him even at the time, and if not, at least were expected to be very shortly.Tavares has been the worst performer of the group over the life of his deal though. The worst by a lot in the playoffs. That was not supposed to be the case when he was paid like a superstar and then later given the C.
just a guy putting up near PPG
maybe 30% or 40% of what he was.
There's zero chance of that happening. You don't have to be a Zadina mind reader to know that.No
Also no. The number floating around online right now is 7.15
You've come up with this fictional narrative that he was supposed to be the best of the four.
The other three were better than him even at the time, and if not, at least were expected to be very shortly.
Forget the money.
The other three guys at age 20 were expected to elevate their games in getting us over the hump, not Tavares at age 27. They didn't, but the blame falls on the guy who has come exactly as promised, and has actually exceeded expectations because even I wasn't going to reasonably expect that he'd potentially be PPG in year 7.
Round 17
And let's not even talk about the big 3's epic playoff flops.
who has put up 425 points in 448 games as a Leaf, and saying he's the reason we haven't won anything.
elite talent
Conservative estimateRound 17
Hey I’m on OG Tavares contract hater too!This time is different though, because more people realize I've been right the entire time now and that the move was a fucking disaster that might have submarined the entire era.
That's an interesting take... I 100% guarantee not signing JT and signing Tanev and Hymen would have been viewed really poorly here.This is the problem though. Tavares was never the elite talent we wanted/needed, that's my point.
I would argue that free agency is the wrong place to be looking for an elite talent for the most part. When they do get moved, it's more often by trade. Panarin is the only elite guy (for sake of discussion let's call that a consensuc top 5 player at their position) I can think of who moved through free agency in the last long ass time.