hockeylover
Well-known member
Doesn’t really make any sense that they seemed to hide Kamala away if there those concerns that early on. Why couldn’t they anticipate this then?
Sanders is on CNN - hasn't endorsed. Says he wants to talk to her first and make sure her agenda speaks to the needs of working families.
Critical of corporate media and wealthy donors for pushing Biden out.
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815583010277724651
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815583471521210853
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815584055385374881
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815584801748824115
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815585778396774463
View: https://x.com/PaulRieckhoff/status/1815586469324493050
Trump is gonna dump JD isn't he? He'll go with Donald's or Scott to counter.
Joe Biden was always a centrist, and always had some appeal to people in the middle. Kamala isn't perceived that way, and I do think she's in trouble if she can't get enough independents and Never-Trumpers on board.He makes a good case for Kelly, but the wrong case for Kelly.
Kelly is a good candidate for VP because he's a good candidate for VP from an important state to secure in this race. Not because he's the closest thing to a republican in the party, yadda yadda. There's this ongoing fiction that democrats need to keep moving further and further to the right to get elected and it's just not fucking true.
Agree, I thought about cutting that tweet cause that part's dumb but decided to just include the entire thread.I think he makes a good case for Kelly but he really loses me with the coronated undemocratically bit.
Joe Biden was always a centrist, and always had some appeal to people in the middle. Kamala isn't perceived that way, and I do think she's in trouble if she can't get enough independents and Never-Trumpers on board.
I agree they shouldn't add a Republican to the ticket, which is why I mentioned that at the top. But it's not a bad thing to have a guy like this on the ticket, considered relatively moderate, liked by independents and has charisma and cachet for his work in the military and as an astronaut.
You have to remember that America is a much more conservative country than Canada, Kelly's appeal to the middle and to military families can bring a lot of people on board, in addition to his main purpose of security Arizona.
The best thing about Kelly is that thing where he’ll never sound like the typical Democrat even when mouthing all the talking points.
some voters find that re-assuring
Roy Cooper has some of that, but he ain’t no cool astronaut
70% is probably about right, but maybe it's 60% if he brings in some extra turnout. Several of these swing states could come down to 50,000 votes or less and while I think Kamala should do great with women, African-Americans and the base, adding a bunch of independent and military votes could put a state or two over the top.Yeah, like I said, Kelly is a good candidate but like 70% of his utility would be in bringing in Arizona, not for what he adds ideologically to the ticket imo. We're at a point where the votes in 3-6 states decide the whole thing and the voting groups in each state aren't uniform.
All I'm saying is that there's constantly think pieces in the US trying to drag democrats further right, when they walk away with elections when they focus on strong economy, labour rights, women's reproductive rights, gun control, medicare for all, etc, etc. Americans love their right wing mythologies in public, and their left wing policies in private.