oscarheyman
Well-known member
That's Susan Collins' line."I didn't think that he was going to do that"
That's Susan Collins' line."I didn't think that he was going to do that"
This is the post of the day.This is what it’s all about…..and I don’t even want to say “dum dums” so much as people who just don’t care to spent their time obsessing about politics.
Plenty of people who just work too much, aren’t online all day, read the NYT, WSJ or WaPo….plenty of very smart capable folks who simply need to be reached & energized to vote.
No messaging spoke to the masses & stuck to their ribs enough to motivate them to get out and vote.
….and like you say, Trump annihilates on that front.
Dems win on turnout…..and we failed to get the turnout we have in the past. Simple as that.
If you do get their ear, you need to have someone who can properly and persuasively and charismatically communicate it too. It’s worthless without that.Is it as simple as learning how to communicate your message to the portion of the electorate that doesn’t get dopamine from reading/listening to/learning about/discussing politics?
Stern was never more popular than when he was interviewing porn stars and doing stupid shit with the Whack Pack. The people that loved that stuff are Roganites. The Stern show on Sirius is for olds now. All he does is whine about not wanting g to leave the house and interviewing middle aged celebrities.Young males are the biggest audience of podcasts and tbh I'm not sure how much interest they'd have in a left slanted podcast. This isn't a new phenomenon either. Long ago when he was relevant, the Stern show was right leaning and they did exuded masculinity and talked about racy subjects that captured the same demographic that shows like the Rogan show capture today.
Talking about being accepting of trannies and whatever else a lib podcast would discuss just won't hit the same for that demo.
shockingly enough there does still seem to be a path to a Dem house...
and this is just the very beginning