LeafGm
Well-known member
It's not about personal prosperity. They lived in peace there, despite there being an undercurrent of bigotry among the masses. It was a country that lived much like Americans did in the US at the time.
And no, sorry, their opinions and the opinions of hundreds of others - both Jewish and Muslim - that I've interacted with over half a century mean more than a few voices here that have literally only read summaries of things on Wiki and prance around as experts. It's like someone now telling a Holocaust survivor about how things really were in Germany, whether one way or the other. I'll take the word of the people who lived through it.
Well, you know, I also legitimately do have family that are from Iran, and were also even a member of a persecuted ethnic & religious minority under the Shah's rule. And they don't (or didn't, in the case of the ones who've since died) have nice things to say about the Shah.
So, boom! My anecdotal evidence cancels out yours. That's how this works, right?
Now I guess we have no choice but to go with heavily documented history, which shows the Shah was a brutal authoritarian dictator who overthrew democracy and directly paved the road to the Islamic fundamentalist government that is anathema to you now.
Last edited: