More fear mongering. Here's a key part of the article:
This is both good and bad news: the theory is that such mutations will make the virus more contagious but potentially less dangerous to those that are affected. Screening also indicates that children seem much less likely to catch the virus, but this may be influenced by the fact that children generally have mild symptoms.
I'm referring to the clickbait tweet. I'm seeing a lot of people using the word "mutation" to incite fear, when in reality most mutations are neutral or even harmful to a virus.That "key part" also happens to be....the headline of the article.
Fear mongering!
More fear mongering. Here's a key part of the article:
This is both good and bad news: the theory is that such mutations will make the virus more contagious but potentially less dangerous to those that are affected. Screening also indicates that children seem much less likely to catch the virus, but this may be influenced by the fact that children generally have mild symptoms.
Damn no need to be so attached to your fear mongering alarmist follows. So offended.The headline says good and bad!
Information is good!
Those are canadian numbers.
950k in a week.
It's a lot.
Damn no need to be so attached to your fear mongering alarmist follows. So offended.
#clickbait #alarmistThe tweeter is the magazine that wrote the article and its headline and url which both say good and bad in them!
Alarmist!