• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: MLB Thread

Dorchester barely exists down at that end. They'd have to bulldoze the old hospital, of course, and probably a city block's worth of buildings along Ste Catherine just east of Lambert Closse. The park and bus loop across the street from the Forum would also go, or maybe the stadium would be built above the bus loop. The park is only used by drug dealers anyway. You could fit a stadium in there, but you'd need to expropriate extra real estate for parking. At least it would be on a Metro station and bus terminal and just up the hill from Lionel Groulx where the Orange Line comes in. At the Peel Basin they'd need to shuttle people from Bonaventure Metro down to the foot of Peel Street. Maybe if they widen the street and run some sort of light rail service down the center that would end at the stadium. But all this costs more money over and above the cost of the stadium itself. If people can't access it, they won't go. You need public transit but people also need to be able to drive to it. The Basin is close to where the old Autostade used to be. It had parking but was nowhere near a Metro. They are also tearing down the Bonaventure Expressway which makes getting in and out of the area more difficult for South Shore residents.
 
There are already plans for Cabot square and it doesn't include a stadium

I know. But pretty much any redevelopment plan in Montreal involves condos. You have to grab the land pretty quickly if you plan on building anything other than a condo.

For the life of me I haven't got a clue as to who is actually buying all these condos. Montreal's economy is in the toilet but after a century of being a city that has more renters than owners everyone suddenly wants to buy a condo.
 
That play by Morales was BUTT UGLY on the comebacker.... perfect double play ball to keep things 6-3.... got no one, and opened floodgates for 3 more.
 
When Lenny Dykstra claimed to have spent $500 000 on private investigators in order to dig up dirt on umpires, did anyone think he was lying.

On one hand he sounded convincing on Colin Cowherd's show and strikes me as the kind of guy who would do such a thing. On the other hand he has a track record of lying and has a book to sell. I could go either way on this.
 
Actually he doesn't have a book to sell. The book he referenced in the Cowherd interview was released a couple of years back. Dykstra is a shady character to be sure and a habitual liar but then so is Jose Canseco. Everyone thought he was lying about steroid use by guys like Big Mac and others just to sell his book until he was eventually proven accurate.

Just because a guy is a liar doesn't mean that he never tells the truth. Once in a while even a liar will say something true. Unfortunately for them it's like the boy who cried wolf.
 
Back
Top