• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: NFL thread

You are going into the playoffs losers of two in a row. That is almost backing in. They were punked in Arizona and punked at home. Yet according to you, it is part of some larger than life plan.
 
Vikes will be underdogs but to say they don't have a shot is an overreach. Similarly, I'm not ready to give up on Teddy.

I have said it before, Vikes are ahead of schedule. This is year 2 of the Zimmer regime and I expected 8 or 9 mins max. Their D has been excellent.

It would be a huge disappointment for Seattle to lose against Minnesota, especially given that we're supposed to get Lynch back for the game.
 
It would be a huge disappointment for Seattle to lose against Minnesota, especially given that we're supposed to get Lynch back for the game.

No doubt Vikes are huge underdogs (7 points as I type this) but I'm happy to see Lynch in the game as I'm more afraid of Russell Wilson.

Vikes need Linval Joseph (Nose Tackle supreme) to get healthy.

weather is supposed to be brutal...about -10 F with the wind chill.
 
No doubt Vikes are huge underdogs (7 points as I type this) but I'm happy to see Lynch in the game as I'm more afraid of Russell Wilson.

Vikes need Linval Joseph (Nose Tackle supreme) to get healthy.

weather is supposed to be brutal...about -10 F with the wind chill.

I hear you, having Lynch might take a few plays away from Wilson, although the Hawks haven't changed their play calling much despite being on their 3rd RB. Still prefer having Lynch than Michael. But it still all will depends on Wilson, our O line vs your D line, and Bridgewater as I suspect we will contain AP once more.
 
one of the best autocorrect jokes ever. I had money on Seattle btw

B80YcMZIUAAqq5n.jpg
 
Standings according to WeHave

1st - Champion
2nd-12th Frauds
13th-32nd Pathetic Failures
 
Back
Top