• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

OT: The Toronto Blue Jays

its funny is all.

and anyways....

Grichuk 102wrc+
Gurriel 84wrc+


last 2yrs

Grichuk 105wrc+
Gurriel 106wrc+
 
its funny is all.

and anyways....

Grichuk 102wrc+
Gurriel 84wrc+


last 2yrs

Grichuk 105wrc+
Gurriel 106wrc+


Eh...when a "2 yr" sample has fewer PA's than a normal 1 yr sample, it kind of loses some of it's value as a predictive tool for future performance:

Last 3 calendar years:

Gurriel: 1036 PA, 115 wRC+
Grichuk: 1463 PA, 103 wRC+

Last 3 "seasons"

Gurriel: 859 PA, 113 wRC+, 2.9 WAR (2.2 WAR/650)
Grichuk: 1185PA, 97 wRC+, 1.6 WAR (0.9 WAR/650)

So yeah, I guess you can place outsized importance on an early Gurriel slump if you really want to, but when he regresses (which appears to be in progress) you're going to look silly.

Grichuk is a 4th OF Zeke, and Gurriel has pretty clearly shown himself to quality starter. That you've resorted to "30hr/100rbi" and "Gurriel can't run routes" and resort to small sample fuckery in an attempt to show otherwise makes it pretty clear that you know this too.
 
Fangraphs combined rest of season projections:

Grichuk 104wrc+
Gurriel 103wrc+

You are wrong.
 
And stop comparing the defense of a guy who is strictly an LF (and a poor one) to a guy who's been a passable CF and good RF defensively his whole career.
 
both.jpg


Both are useful players, and both can play about 2/3 of the time since Springer still takes a bunch of time off as a DH, and Lourdes can probably fill in at 1B when Vlad needs a day off the field.

There isn't a huge gap between them, so really it should just be whoever woke up on the right side of the bed that morning that starts, and you'll often still have both around the lineup anyways. Grichuk has done well enough to earn his time, but Gurriel at this point definitely has the higher potential.
 
And stop comparing the defense of a guy who is strictly an LF (and a poor one) to a guy who's been a passable CF and good RF defensively his whole career.

Except we've already established that he's not a poor LF. You just continue to assert that he is because throwing the ball isn't important to you for reasons.

and Grichuk isn't remotely a passable CF. He's been the 3rd worst CF in MLB (min 300 innings) this season after being a bottom 5 CF last season as well. Being able to play CF poorly isn't a skill.

He's a decent enough 4th OF, but that's about the extent of him. Gurriel is a starting calibre corner OF, full stop.
 
both.jpg


Both are useful players, and both can play about 2/3 of the time since Springer still takes a bunch of time off as a DH, and Lourdes can probably fill in at 1B when Vlad needs a day off the field.

There isn't a huge gap between them, so really it should just be whoever woke up on the right side of the bed that morning that starts, and you'll often still have both around the lineup anyways. Grichuk has done well enough to earn his time, but Gurriel at this point definitely has the higher potential.


Gurriel has provided over double the value over the last few seasons. It's really not that close.
 
Gurriel would probably be as good or better than Grichuk in CF if they played him there. Faster, better arm, also limited in some ways. Grichuck gets zero points from me for playing a bad CF, and negative points from WAR calculations.

Grichuk is hitting .219/.235/.354 in the last 28 games. This is not even a particularly bad slump for him, he goes through month-long stretches like this several times every season.

Also, "on pace for 30HR", lol. Looks good on the back of a baseball card, but Grichuk is on pace for 24 BB and yet another OBP well under .300. He is what he is. Bat not good enough to play corner OF, defence not good enough to play up the middle. If he gets hot again, trade him for whatever you can get. Reallocate the resources to something useful.
 
Gurriel would probably be as good or better than Grichuk in CF if they played him there. Faster, better arm, also limited in some ways. Grichuck gets zero points from me for playing a bad CF, and negative points from WAR calculations.

Grichuk is hitting .219/.235/.354 in the last 28 games. This is not even a particularly bad slump for him, he goes through month-long stretches like this several times every season.

Also, "on pace for 30HR", lol. Looks good on the back of a baseball card, but Grichuk is on pace for 24 BB and yet another OBP well under .300. He is what he is. Bat not good enough to play corner OF, defence not good enough to play up the middle. If he gets hot again, trade him for whatever you can get. Reallocate the resources to something useful.


That money would look so much better in the bullpen. We haven't even touched on the contracts.

Gurriel: 27 yrs old, Signed for 2 more years after this at 3.1 million, with arby eligibility in 2024. Free agency in 2025 at 31 yrs old.
Grichuk: 29 yrs old (30 in August), 2 more years at 10.4 million.

Better, younger, and 7+ million dollars cheaper.
 
A lot of the fanbase likes Grichuk. On pace for 30HR and 100RBIs explains most of it. Not sure what the deal is in this case.
 
A lot of the fanbase likes Grichuk. On pace for 30HR and 100RBIs explains most of it. Not sure what the deal is in this case.

He's fine as a 4th or 5th OF option. Ignoring contracts, I'd certainly rather have him around than Davis. And given Springer still needs some time at DH, and Grichuk can play a decent enough corner OF defense, I don't mind keeping him around and letting him play when the other guys need breaks. But unless if he's on a hot streak, he probably shouldn't start every day now that the other guys are back.
 
The hate on Grichuk here is kinda misplaced - which is understandable as he was a Shatkins Trade and then Re-signing, so ofc he is bad ;p (this is a joke).

But in reality, Grichuk is a fine, AVERAGE, MLB Outfielder. Probably more in line of a 4th Outfielder on a contending team. Or a fine (just fine) Outfielder on a rebuilding team.

He can play ALL the outfield positions and is a PLUS defender in RF. I look at him as Poor Mans Kevin Pillar (way less Defense, better hitting with more power, both can't get on base to save their lives).

And his contract isn't even that bad - maybe bad for a cheap org like TB, but not for a mid-market team. He is currently at 0.9 WAR, and I bet he gets to 1.5 at the end of this year - more power, and probably more time in RF were he excels. He just won't have a high OBP, not bad for an 4th OF or 8th in the batting order. Grichuk just shouldn't be hitting against good RH Pitchers - this is why Dickerson was brought in/ Jays had high hopes for Tellez.

If you go by 1 WAR = 8 mil in FA, then his contract is right in line for what he is.

Non-Adjusted Cost of a Win in Free Agency: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/the-cost-of-a-win-in-free-agency-in-2020/

OffseasonCost of a Win in Free Agency
2018$8.1 M/WAR
2019$6.8 M/WAR
2020$8.0 M/WAR
 
Overweighting a slump, nothing more.

ah yes the projections are famous for not weighting things properly.

first you try to mock me for looking at bad stats (which were only an amusing observation), then you ignore the good comprehensive stats that actually matter. poor flailing ME.
 
Back
Top