GGpX
Well-known member
Again, categorically false. The UFC's making more money than they've ever had and they're leveraging McGregor to improve the next TV / Stream contract they're going to get. The logic is, since McGregor flaked out from his fight against Chandler, the UFC's in no rush to offer him a new date even though he's clamoring for it. So when their deal with ESPN is up, the UFC can offer the TV / Streaming platforms two McGregor fights instead of just one.With their willingness to lose money, the only hope. It’d be very tough, but I’m guessing if they bought off athletes and went the lawyer route to get them out of their contracts. I have always wondered what would happen in court if someone tried to buy out the fighters from these contracts that the courts are leaning towards saying the ufc are offside with them with the lawsuit. Might be the most interesting time to actually pressure the courts with flat out testing these contractor agreements. Trained lawyers might know the answer already lol.
It would come down to how well they can develop stars. The UFC has struggled doing this lately as they seem to not want a Conor situation to happen again. So lean on the brand more so. Competitors have really struggled with the marketing aspect.
I never thought the WWF could be in trouble, until they were for a bit. Who the fuck knows with the ufc - such a young sport.
If there was a way for the fighters to lawyer their way out of their deals, they would have a long time ago when Couture brought them to court and their contracts weren't nearly as restrictive as they are now.