• Moderators, please send me a PM if you are unable to access mod permissions. Thanks, Habsy.

Rumors: 2024-25 Season

I know I'm getting old but I swear we used to complain we had to give up assets for 3rd and 4th liners because our own weren't good enough, yet some want to so that again
yup.

THEY JUST CAN'T DO IT RIGHT AND SOMEONE HERE SHOULD BE RUNNING THE TEAM!

UUUUUUUUUUUUAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHH!
 
I know I'm getting old but I swear we used to complain we had to give up assets for 3rd and 4th liners because our own weren't good enough, yet some want to so that again
I have no issue giving up thirds and fourths for a depth piece that contributes with limited term at the deadline if your contending

Contenders like TB gave up firsts for the Coleman and Goodrow types but won cups

I like Evans but sorry not the player I give 4 years and 3.5 -4 mil talked about here at this stage of our rebuild

I dont care about the cap or % and not overpaying for secondary pieces is a tool all regimes can use

I gave a concrete example last week how the Bruins spent 5mil and have the same production as our 4 players making 20 mil and they did it again the year before with JVR/Heinman/Geekie

Other examples like Gaudette , McMann etc... that give you good secondary production on the cheap

We simply disagree on Jakes value , thats fine .
 
I would sign Jake at the right deal. Bird in the hand . He has proven his worth over the years, he is home grown (isn't that the point)), I would go 3 maybeeeeeeee 4 years which would put him at 31 to 32 years old (he will be 29 for next season) at the end of the contract. If the dollar amount is right I don't see the issue..
 
I would sign Jake at the right deal. Bird in the hand . He has proven his worth over the years, he is home grown (isn't that the point)), I would go 3 maybeeeeeeee 4 years which would put him at 31 to 32 years old (he will be 29 for next season) at the end of the contract. If the dollar amount is right I don't see the issue..
I’d rather give him term than money. I’m fine with 5 or 6 years at a relatively low cap hit.
 
channelling my best Teeds imitation, I like Jake, he has a deep voice, not some high pitched nasally voice like some players, that is a man's voice he has, gotta keep him
 
At $2.5m you can move him any time. I think 3 or 4 years is perfect for both sides though because should he continue to improve he can get a retirement contract at 31-32.
 
Back
Top