I'm very okay with this at this point
That's why the name Kaprizov is interesting... .there was another name as well, I think starting with a W but I don't see that name on the Wild's team or maybe it is on LA's.Problem regarding Marner is that there's always only going to be a handful of players in the league worth trading him for. We can look at the Calgary Tkachuk trade as guidance here. Even that was probably a mistake trade that only works if you're going balls deep to win now, in the next 2-3 years (which with a 30+ yr old "star" goalie, and signing Kadri, they are). For us though, it's basically an elite C/W in their early to mid prime or a young stud defender. Pretty short list.
Trading him just to trade him would be the height of stupidity. Trading him for a similar quality but different type of player at a lower cap hit isn't the worst idea ever, but it's a hell of a needle to thread.
a little surprised - i thought he'd be moving Kampf back up but its Holmberg in the more offensive role.
Tre Kronor 3rd line.
though that 4th line doesn't make much sense.
Marner's a great player and I don't really care what he's like one way or another but if we lost him for fair value I wouldn't mind having his vibe off the team. Seems unlikely we'd get fair value however.
That dude constantly includes me in all his tweets. He's weird.that creep on Grandma Dubie's twitter I'd like to punch right in the fucking face.