Every time I see his name, I think, if I were still humoring Frenemy, he would have used the "Lafferty and the LAFFS" side-splitter a thousand times by now.Not sure he belongs on the 4th either.
Should have took reliable/serviceable defenseman Connor Murphy from Chicago instead of lafferty. Murphy is Jake McCabe status. One more quality depth defenseman wouldn’t have hurt.Every time I see his name, I think, if I were still humoring Frenemy, he would have used the "Lafferty and the LAFFS" side-splitter a thousand times by now.
For that reason, I want him to be good. Like go all Nick Paul for us in Game 7 so that the portal to a Costanza bizarro universe opens up where we all enter and the opposite of all the bullshit since 1967 happens from here on out.
Not quite the ONLY wayBut the only way for Matty to get more PP time is to play the full 2 minutes. He’s already playing 1:20 or so of each one, I’d guess.
Unless the comment is about the refs and that we don’t get enough PPs? Not going to be able to do anything about that.
True, so what is the sitch, we want him to get 20 seconds more per PP or something? Does that get him to where the others are?Not quite the ONLY way
We want the Leafs to not consistently be bottom 5 in the NHL in PP time throughout Auston's career. Although there were far more PPs in general in the early days of Ovy so it still won't be comparable.True, so what is the sitch, we want him to get 20 seconds more per PP or something? Does that get him to where the others are?
But the only way for Matty to get more PP time is to play the full 2 minutes. He’s already playing 1:20 or so of each one, I’d guess.
Unless the comment is about the refs and that we don’t get enough PPs? Not going to be able to do anything about that.
Fun update.
No, we want the Leafs to get fair amounts of PP timeTrue, so what is the sitch, we want him to get 20 seconds more per PP or something? Does that get him to where the others are?