It was a method to communicate nerd shit to Babcock without him rolling his eyes and ignoring the data. Speak Babcockian and he'll start listening.Did we ever figure out what "heavy shifts" were?
Did we ever figure out what "heavy shifts" were?
It was a method to communicate nerd shit to Babcock without him rolling his eyes and ignoring the data. Speak Babcockian and he'll start listening.
Communicating these things to coaches/GMs effectively is 90% of the job for the nerds in these organizations. The last thing you want to do is get too technical because that's when the hockey guys zone you out.
Btw presser is at 11
Montana 180, scheduled for 11:
PP goals don't countRunning tab:
- regular season success [doesnt count]
- any Keefe success [doesnt count]
- beating a dynasty [doesnt count]
- playoff wins in OT [doesnt count]
- trading for Hyman [doesnt count]
- bad Treliving signings [doesnt count; cause Calgary]
- Treliving’s Tkachuk trade [doesnt really count]
- bad Treliving extensions [doesnt count]
- drafting Knies [doesnt count, took too long]
- signing Bunting for top 6 [doesnt meet mbow criteria]
Yep. His choice seemed to be mess with the core or try something different with the rest.I kinda feel like the process was pretty good initially and Dubas leaned further away from it in direct response to more losing in the playoffs.
the process was flawed.
the only way to explain that away is to pretend like they are the unluckiest group of people ever. lWhich is rich coming from the guy keeping a list of explaining things away. you are the same as everyone you are arguing with, just with your own bias.