I don’t really get the comparison at all with Engvall.
Big, not particularly physical, impactful on both sides of the puck.
There are obvious differences, but I figured that baked into to the whole "20+ goal" bit that people keep wanting to ignore that I said. Engvall wouldn't be "Engvall" if he was good enough to regularly score 20+. Knies is obviously much better with the puck on his stick in the offensive zone and doesn't just skate it in circles around the offensive zone and look to fire a turnaround wrister on net as his primary weapon.
Fwiw, it was meant as comp regarding level of impact, not specifically stylistic.
But if the kid turns into a ~25/55 type two way winger, that's not the "stud!!!!!!" that his biggest supporters here keep suggesting (which to me suggests 30+/70+ or better at current league scoring rates) and would be more in line with what I've been saying.