You put way too much stock into the exhibition. Chad Henne hasn't even take an NFL snap yet (exhibition doesn't count), and he is the answer to all the Dolphins problems.
so let me get this straight, you are comparing the development time it usually takes a QB, 3 years, compared to a lineman or a linebacker ?
Talk to me again in week 17. If Gholston is lost then, they maybe you have to start to worry. Before he even plays his first NFL game? Nah.
If the guy looked just average out there against starters, it would be one thing.. But he has been just horrible in every way.
And the missconception is that he is JUST a workout warrior. He produced in college. He was an elite defensive player, on an elite defense.
He was not near being a complete player though.. And when you pick at #6, the smart thing to do is get a more complete player.. Gholston is just a one trick pony, he always has been.. And even then, he only has one move.
He wasn't a guy who was ok in college, then rocketed up the board on the strength of his combine performance
Right. He was a guy that was tremendously over hyped. Like many before him who eventually did little in the NFL.
And as far as DE not taking time to develop...Gains Adams has 6 sacks last year, Jamal Anderson had none.
Number 1 pick Mario Williams had 4 sacks as a rookie and 14 last year. You have to go back to Terell Suggs in 2003 to find the last DE to have a great rookie year. You are just wrong.
You are comparing him to coverage and run guys, not pass rushers. Its an irrelevant comparison.
Except for the fact that most of those players started. At the draft last year I thought Jamaal Anderson was another overrated draftee who won't be much in the NFL.
And since when are sacks the end all be all? My goodness, hurries and pressures causes QB's to make mistakes.. Loss of down, INT , penalty calls like intentional grounding etc , negative offensive plays occur etc etc. And those guys showed that (with the exception of anderson)..
With that said, anything can happen, like I said before. But I thought he was a reach pick at the time because he is so far away from a complete football player. He's a project type of player.
When you draft players that high in the draft, they should be more complete. Gholston just has bad form on run plays and was below average against the run ( hence his low tackle numbers). Gholston was very weak on the backside contain.. Not to mention only one move.. And he certainly doesn't seem like the smartest cookie in the jar.
With that said, good luck to him. he may pan out yet. I just didn't like where he was drafted-- although I liked the fact that the Jets picked him because there were better players on the draft board.