Gonna be hard to fall off too much if Auston's scoring 70Of course he could fall off this year tho
Nick Robertson should be taking that spot.
ELC kids taking more spots leaves us more money to sign guys like Bunting.
Gonna be hard to fall off too much if Auston's scoring 70![]()
Hyman got 7 years at 5.5 a year ago. Adjust for cap inflation and a superior track record and we're surely going well over 6m on a 7-8 year deal. Do you sign him or target a legit stud that can drive his own line for just a couple million more?When I say paid like a depth guy I mean Burakowsky or Hyman.
Bunting was worth way more than that this year. But he is very unlikely to get top line money.
Well see what Bunting does this year, but the key thing with him is that over the last 2 years in the NHL he has been an impact player and not just another depth guy.
![]()
And he will likely be paid like a good depth guy and not an impact player.
Dom did say he was trying to adjust the model to better filter out linemate effects.
Thing is, the model already has Matthews as the best player last year (by a lot) and Marner also top-5.....so if Bunting is leeching value off of them than that means that Matthews and Marner are even better than the model already thinks, which would be cray.
9-10m dollar value? I can't assign that value to a guy that isn't a line driver himself. Great player and worth trying to keep but let's not get carried away either.
Yeah, I agree with that. I guess I just don't see him being paid as little as Hyman .They are just arbitrary numbers. Paid like a Hyman, but produce way more value than a Hyman.
If the premise is that he will be paid like Hyman, that is a big discount if he continues to bring what he did this year.