Volcanologist
Well-known member
also Lindholm preferred Boston. there's that too.
also Lindholm preferred Boston. there's that too.
What goalie is worth a first that's reasonably available? Their value is usually pretty low compared to other positions.No trading 1sts for older goalies.
Draft a goalie with it instead.
the cannolis are better
I mean, our first is what, like late 20s? I'd say we can grab whoever we think is the best goalie in the draft, unless there's some superstar prospect who's ranked to go earlier.What goalie is worth a first that's reasonably available? Their value is usually pretty low compared to other positions.
Then don't use the 1st on one this year, but don't use it on another shit lottery ticket netminder either.Not a great year for goalies
Wasn't suggesting it would help us anytime soon.Even a guy like Vasilevskiey didn't make an impact in the NHL until year 3, and wasn't a starter until year 5.
Not saying don't draft goalies, they should, but thats not helping for a bit.
This worst defensive dman on the team stuff, brings every player he plays with down, trade calls, and so on sound like he's pretty not great.(no one has said that Rielly isn't great)
He's amazing, yes. But you often mistake amazing and flawless. He's not flawless. Neither is Tavares. Neither is Muzzin! But the Leafs have more Rielly types than Muzzin's in the pipeline. For that reason, people are willing to think about trading him.This worst defensive dman on the team stuff, brings every player he plays with down, trade calls, and so on sound like he's pretty not great.
Meanwhile, he's our top horse who helped lead the team to its best finish ever.
he's our top horse
When did I say he's flawless? Just saying he's a great player, just like Tavares.He's amazing, yes. But you often mistake amazing and flawless. He's not flawless. Neither is Tavares. Neither is Muzzin! But the Leafs have more Rielly types than Muzzin's in the pipeline. For that reason, people are willing to think about trading him.
That's fine. Now add the scoring.Playoffs TOI
EV
1. Brodie 18:11
2. Muzz 18:10
3. Rielly 18:03
SH
1. Brodie 3:53
2. Muzz 3:49
6. Rielly 0:27
Great players are allowed to be analyzed where their strengths and weaknesses are discussed, no? Or does this not apply to Rielly and Tavares?When did I say he's flawless? Just saying he's a great player, just like Tavares.