lecoqsportif
Well-known member
Yes, we'll draft Michkov if he's still available, which would be a surprise, actually (us drafting him).
Bobrov’s dad being affiliated with St. Petersburg SKA is intriguing.
Yes, we'll draft Michkov if he's still available, which would be a surprise, actually (us drafting him).
Well if it's a night with my mom, go for it. She's 84, shits into a diaper and sees dead people. Have fun.If that question was asked by either the count or we have, I would say the cost is a night with your mom. But given that you were not, then I will refrain.
That's a fun question, even if there is no way Chicago trades the pick.Why not Straight to Number One?
Columbus might be open to trade for immediate help. They want a center though. I'm pretty sure that #5 + Dach would do it but I wouldn't do that trade. I don't think they're interested in Anderson. They might want young defensemen, I wouldn't trade Guhle, Harris is not enough, and I'm not sure if they would have an interest in Mailloux, Barron or Arber.what would be the cost to move to #3 from #5?
Thats a 10 year rebuild on our handsThat's a fun question, even if there is no way Chicago trades the pick.
I'd start the offer with Suzuki, Caufield, and our 1st.
Columbus is taking Smith or the SwedeColumbus might be open to trade for immediate help. They want a center though. I'm pretty sure that #5 + Dach would do it but I wouldn't do that trade. I don't think they're interested in Anderson. They might want young defensemen, I wouldn't trade Guhle, Harris is not enough, and I'm not sure if they would have an interest in Mailloux, Barron or Arber.
I don't think we get much of an uptick from 5 to 3. If we could somehow get to #2 and Fantilli then sure (depending on what we'd have to part with)what would be the cost to move to #3 from #5?
what if Michkov is a homophobe and unwoke?I don't think we get much of an uptick from 5 to 3. If we could somehow get to #2 and Fantilli then sure (depending on what we'd have to part with)
Still, I think Michkov may wind up being better than all of them save for Bedard. If Bedard goes first and Michkov second then maybe make a play for #3 and take Fantilli
Can’t be. WeHave didn’t have kidswhat if Michkov is a homophobe and unwoke?
Is it though? McDavid turned the Oilers around pretty fast.Thats a 10 year rebuild on our hands
Is it though? McDavid turned the Oilers around pretty fast.
It's not touching our defense, it saves us $16M in cap, we can easily add PLD without worrying about the structure, and we now have the hottest young player to reach the league since McDavid.
I don't think Chicago goes for it but yes it is steep.
Kane is the worst case scenario for Bedard (still a great case). He's going to be somewhere between McDavid and Matthews.Its gut job part 2 , sets us back 5 years
McDavid had Jesus part 2 on his side and CMD is on his own island of greatness
I like Bedard but my projection is Patrick Kane , I dont recall a 5`9" player ever carrying a team on his back
Plus he went to to the worst possible situation ...Bedard and an AHL roster
I will gladly keep my 70-80 goals plus whoever we draft at 5 plus over Bedard
Its gut job part 2 , sets us back 5 years
He isnt 5`10, unless he grew recentlyKane is the worst case scenario for Bedard (still a great case). He's going to be somewhere between McDavid and Matthews.
And he's 5'10. Crosby is 5'11. I don't think that inch matters.
For a guy that wants elite talent, you sure don't seems too hell bent on trying to get them.
CC will outscore himwe're 5 years away now...go with Bedard
He will need reeducation like Mailloux did.what if Michkov is a homophobe and unwoke?
Na , maybe 2 for the playoffs and 3-5 to be a legit playoff competitorwe're 5 years away now...go with Bedard