cmaleski2
Well-known member
I have no issue with Rantanen electing to not sign here. Again my position is once he was traded away from Colorado, there really is little reason for him to sign with the Canes. The whole 'only Canes can give him 8 years' argument is only partially true (team can trade for his rights).
Now that he is no longer negotiating with Colorado to stay, if I'm Mikko Rantanen, I'm 100% going to UFA so I can pick the team I'm signing my next contract with. I would be stunned if Rantanen elects to just sign with the Canes before the trade deadline. The only risk Rantanen has here is a career ending injury between now and the end of the season.
I'm 100% good with Mikko Rantanen's position.
Sure the Canes seem likely to just treat this as a rental and do nothing before the deadline. I expect though that even if we decide we are not shopping Rantanen, we sure as heck are listening to offers from team like the LA Kings.
Now that he is no longer negotiating with Colorado to stay, if I'm Mikko Rantanen, I'm 100% going to UFA so I can pick the team I'm signing my next contract with. I would be stunned if Rantanen elects to just sign with the Canes before the trade deadline. The only risk Rantanen has here is a career ending injury between now and the end of the season.
I'm 100% good with Mikko Rantanen's position.
Sure the Canes seem likely to just treat this as a rental and do nothing before the deadline. I expect though that even if we decide we are not shopping Rantanen, we sure as heck are listening to offers from team like the LA Kings.