You’re such a downer.I love the wishful thinking of trading for forwards yet every single name that is brought up is being denied immediately, like any team would be willing to trade their best forwards for our spare Ds.
You’re such a downer.I love the wishful thinking of trading for forwards yet every single name that is brought up is being denied immediately, like any team would be willing to trade their best forwards for our spare Ds.
pot meet kettleYou’re such a downer.
I was being facetious, obviously.pot meet kettle
Second tier forward? What are you talking about?
I don’t have a crystal ball, bro, nor do you.Who are the Tier 1 forwards after Demidov.
Connelly? That might be it. And he’s a winger. Who are the top tier centres in this draft who will move the ball more than Suzuki already can with Slafkovsky?
unless you weren't...I was being facetious, obviously.
I don’t have a crystal ball, bro, nor do you.
Is Catton that guy? Because he’s the wildcard, IMO.
Or Trevor Connelly (who is not a centre.)
or lose 4-1Yippie, we can lose a lot of 2-1 games.
Maybe, but D are so hard to project.I'd bet at least 3 elite D are drafted this year.
Don't disagree.Maybe, but D are so hard to project.
He probably wont be eliteApparently everyone is hard to project except Celebrini.
The idea behind drafting a forward at 5 is to average closer to 3 goals per game.or lose 4-1
He looks like a good one.He probably wont be elite
A better skating Scheiffle with a touch more skillHe looks like a good one.
Habs are close to 3 goals a game but maybe giving up .5 goals a game less makes a bigger differenceThe idea behind drafting a forward at 5 is to average closer to 3 goals per game.
A better skating Scheiffle with a touch more skill
Lindstrom?
Who knows.
But Hughes has gone off the popular track before. No wright or Leonard or michkov