Yeah, I don't consider him part of the return. They're likely to just let him walk as a UFA
People seem to get pretty good assets for 1st round picks regularly in trade. "A" asset? Maybe not, but a B+ asset...for Zucker?
PPG+ RHD defensive prospect. Plus skater, good all around. Probably a #2-3 upside in the mold of the Dubas "modern" NHL defender.
I'm not sure why we would think so. 1.89 P/60 on almost 15% OISH. -3.39 xgf rel, one of the worst marks among Wild forwards this season. 1.37 P/60 last season (8th among Wild forwards). 2.1 P/60 the year prior. Which makes this season look a lot more like that Zucker than last season's Zucker if you squint a bit, but 14.8% OISH makes that just flat out unsustainable, or even close. 10.89% 5 on 5 OISH as well, compare that to 5 on 5 god, Auston Matthews at 9.52% 5 on 5 OISH.
To be fair, his 18/19 season was a SH%/OISH% shit show. So we if take seasons 25-27 as a unit to iron out the shooting percentage driven wrinkles, he comes out at 1.76 P/60. Kappy has been 1.82 over the same period, Hyman 1.87, AJ 2.08. That's a lot of cake and term for a middle 6 winger on the wrong side of his offensive prime.
If we had made a similar trade: A 1st + good but not great prospect (probably a better prospect than anything we gave up in the Muzz deal)for a guy in the middle of a flat out bad season, signed for 3/16.5, who was never that good to begin with, you would have hated it. Shit, if we signed Zucker this summer to a 3/16.5 deal with no lost assets, you would hate it.