We have $8m cap space. If Weber were to retire in this off-season the penalty would be $762K .It would hurt a little, but not much.
And like I mentioned, it's the most unlikely way the Weber contract could hurt the Habs. Weber would have to know he'd both be leaving money on the table and hurting his two former teams if he retired, so I don't see why he'd do it.
The bigger danger is Weber wanting to hang on and continue playing too long, but I don't know whether that's likely either.
I don't care if fans want a tank... There is no chance they want to risk a $12m or $24m penalty if he retires a year or 2 before his contract is up.Preds don't really have much of a team.
Their window is closed, the cap recapture would only make them tanking all that much easier.
It would simply be a easier pill to swallow.I don't care if fans want a tank... There is no chance they want to risk a $12m or $24m penalty if he retires a year or 2 before his contract is up.
We have $8m cap space. If Weber were to retire in this off-season the penalty would be $762K .
It would not hurt at all.
21-22 - $543K
22-23 - $215K
And after that... when he's actually likely to retire there's not penalty against the Habs at all.
Habs have zero worries about him retiring.
Imagine Weber on the Leafs PP? He draws so much attention that the forwards would have a field day.
I think we're just quibbling over language at this point. Cap penalties of $543K and $215K are tiny amounts, but they are amounts that are larger that zero, and they are an opportunity cost whether the Habs planned to use that cap space or not.
Which is why I'm saying "it wouldn't hurt much" rather than "it would not hurt at all". Fundamentally though, it seems like we're in agreement on the likelihood of a Weber retirement and on the impact it'd have on the Habs going forward.
Weber's obviously a great PP quarterback, but it's tough to get too excited about that idea when your team already has Morgan Rielly and Tyson Barrie.
Depends. Some teams embrace the rebuild.That's just not how management will ever look at it.
Yeah.Weber will not "retire". The Preds will pick him up from the Habs when he's done with hockey and book him a cabana spot on their version of Robidas island.
And the Habs need to make them pay up for that luxury.Weber will not "retire". The Preds will pick him up from the Habs when he's done with hockey and book him a cabana spot on their version of Robidas island.
And the Habs need to make them pay up for that luxury.
I don't see why not.I don't see why.
I don't see why not.
If he retires the Preds are screwed. If they have him, they can make sure he goes on the LTIR. The Habs have no reason to make that happen.
Weber will only have $1m a year for the final couple years. I guess it'll come down to what he wants to do.If he retires, he's out money. Why take a pound of flesh to **** Weber out of money he would otherwise easily earn sitting on LTIR? There's literally no other benefit for the Habs. Take your mid rounder of C prospect and move on. You got your money's worth out of Shea and would be done with him.
Weber will only have $1m a year for the final couple years. I guess it'll come down to what he wants to do.
Trades are all about value. The value of saving $8m, $12m a year is considerable. They don't have to absolutely rape Nashville... but they should get something of value.
I mean the Leafs paid a 1st to save a few mil on Marleau.